2011
DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2011.576430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bacterial examinations between eosinophilic and neutrophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Abstract: In all, 29 and 41 patients were classified as having eosinophilic and neutrophilic CRS with nasal polyps, respectively. The isolation rate of bacteria showed no significant difference between eosinophilic (90%) and neutrophilic CRS (98%). Aerobic bacteria were found in 25 patients (86%) with eosinophilic CRS, which was not significantly different from that in neutrophilic CRS (40 patients, 98%). The isolation rate for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria showed no significant differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
10
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results suggest that eosinophilic CRSwNP could be affected by bacteria as well as non-eosinophilic CRSwNP. Although slightly different from our results, a study in Japan, including 51 isolates of 29 patients, also demonstrated isolation rate of bacteria were high (90%) in eosinophilic CRSwNP patients, which were not different with neutrophilic CRSwNP (98%) and no differences in detected bacteria between two groups [16]. Two other previous studies showed that S. aureus were increased in CRSwNP with blood eosinophilia, [6] and significantly less gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria were isolated from the CRS patients with blood eosinophilia [14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our results suggest that eosinophilic CRSwNP could be affected by bacteria as well as non-eosinophilic CRSwNP. Although slightly different from our results, a study in Japan, including 51 isolates of 29 patients, also demonstrated isolation rate of bacteria were high (90%) in eosinophilic CRSwNP patients, which were not different with neutrophilic CRSwNP (98%) and no differences in detected bacteria between two groups [16]. Two other previous studies showed that S. aureus were increased in CRSwNP with blood eosinophilia, [6] and significantly less gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria were isolated from the CRS patients with blood eosinophilia [14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, S. epidermidis , Corynebacterium species, and Enterobacter species were significantly associated with eosinophilic CRSwNP and Haemophilus species, Klebsiella species, and P. aeruginosa with non-eosinophilic CRSwNP. Non-eosinophilic CRSwNP has been expected to be more affected by a bacterial infection and different microbiology compared to eosinophilic CRSwNP since non-eosinophilic CRSwNP is associated with Th1 and Th17 immune response but eosinophilic CRSwNP with Th2 response [15,16]. However, our results suggest that eosinophilic CRSwNP could be affected by bacteria as well as non-eosinophilic CRSwNP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These cells have limited bactericidal capacity and, under some circumstances, can be even killed by biofilm-derived toxins (Drenkard 2003;Jensen et al 2007;Alhede et al 2009). Some reports have demonstrated neutrophilic infiltration in CRS (Rowe-Jones et al 1997;Hirotsu et al 2011). However, the presence and the role of BAN subtypes (N1 vs. N2 neutrophils) in chronic inflammations associated with biofilm, including CRS, need to be explained.…”
Section: Groups Of Bacteria Speciesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, the association of neutrophil infiltration in CRS with and without nasal polyps is not well documented (Hirotsu et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the type of inflammatory cell infiltration, CRSwNP can be divided into two subgroups: Eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic or neutrophilic (5). Non-eosinophilic CRSwNP always presents with neutrophil-predominant inflammation (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%