1997
DOI: 10.1039/a700465f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Axially and Radially Viewed Inductively Coupled Plasmas for Multi-element Analysis: Effect of Sodium and Calcium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
70
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
70
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of higher plasma powers may increase the noise level and also the background signal affecting the determination of microconstituents, 19 as Mn and Fe. On the other hand, Silva et al 20 observed that the degradation of LOD values when the plasma was operated at high applied powers was not so large, compared to the values in low applied powers.…”
Section: Instrumental Parameters Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of higher plasma powers may increase the noise level and also the background signal affecting the determination of microconstituents, 19 as Mn and Fe. On the other hand, Silva et al 20 observed that the degradation of LOD values when the plasma was operated at high applied powers was not so large, compared to the values in low applied powers.…”
Section: Instrumental Parameters Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix elements with a low first ionization potential (K, Na, Rb, Cs) were found to cause signal suppression or enhancement, depending on the analyte (56)(57)(58). A new kind of matrix interference was found and seems to be correlated with the second ionization potential of some matrix elements (33,34).…”
Section: Inductively Coupled Plasmamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This situation characterizes a robust plasma and may be advantageous to decompose organic samples and to minimize matrix effects, mainly interferences of easily ionized elements, such as Na, K, and Ca. 17 Robustness as a parameter is calculated by dividing the emissions of the ionic (280.270 nm) and atomic (285.213 nm) lines of Mg 12 and a Mg II/Mg I ratio equal or higher than 10 represents a robust plasma. 17 For the nebulization gas flow rate (NFR) evaluation, the plasma power (1300 W) and the auxiliary gas flow rate (0.5 L min -1 ) were fixed and the NFR was varied.…”
Section: Plasma Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Robustness as a parameter is calculated by dividing the emissions of the ionic (280.270 nm) and atomic (285.213 nm) lines of Mg 12 and a Mg II/Mg I ratio equal or higher than 10 represents a robust plasma. 17 For the nebulization gas flow rate (NFR) evaluation, the plasma power (1300 W) and the auxiliary gas flow rate (0.5 L min -1 ) were fixed and the NFR was varied. The results obtained are presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Plasma Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%