Computers in Cardiology
DOI: 10.1109/cic.2002.1166699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of atrial rhythm extraction techniques for the estimation of the main atrial frequency from the 12-lead electrocardiogram in atrial fibrillation

Abstract: One of the greatest challenges in analysis of the atrial rhythm from the ECG is to distinguish the atrial component from the large ventricular components. Our aim was to compare three techniques of atrial rhythm extraction from three groups working on this problem. 12-lead ECG data from 7 patients in atrial fibrillation were analysed. For extraction of the atrial rhythm, spatiotemporal QRST cancellation was performed by the Lund group, blind source separation by the Valencia group, and principal component anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contraction of the atria during fibrillation, the ventricles in the cardiac cycle or any other relative movement from sources to observations, could violate the assumption of spatial stationarity. The authors consider that these variations do not affect significantly the ICA model in AF: firstly, results of the AA have demonstrated its validity [10,11], secondly, the main atrial frequency of AA obtained using ICA is in agreement with the results obtained via other accepted AA extraction techniques [20]. Finally, the MMPS corroboration gives the definitive support to say that the 12-lead ECG of an AF recording fulfills the instantaneous linear mixing ICA model.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contraction of the atria during fibrillation, the ventricles in the cardiac cycle or any other relative movement from sources to observations, could violate the assumption of spatial stationarity. The authors consider that these variations do not affect significantly the ICA model in AF: firstly, results of the AA have demonstrated its validity [10,11], secondly, the main atrial frequency of AA obtained using ICA is in agreement with the results obtained via other accepted AA extraction techniques [20]. Finally, the MMPS corroboration gives the definitive support to say that the 12-lead ECG of an AF recording fulfills the instantaneous linear mixing ICA model.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Considering the spectral mor- phology of AA, with a very pronounced peak, no harmonics and insignificant amplitudes above 15Hz [8,20], it is possible to define a performance extraction index to evaluate the AA extraction quality based on the spectral concentration, that can be defined as [15] SC = 1.17fp 0.82fp…”
Section: Measurement Of Atrial Activity Estimation Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, there are several techniques that can extract the AA with a good performance-Blind Source Separation [2], Spatio-Temporal Cancellation [3,4]-but poor results are obtained when the number of used reference signals (leads) is less than three, or when the duration of these signals is reduced. On the other hand, classic techniques-Average Beat Subtraction (AVBS) [5]-have developed AA extraction from only one lead, but these systems are very sensitive to the presence of ectopic complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fact that the atrial activity has much lower amplitude than ventricular activity and that both are spectrally overlapped makes atrial activity estimation difficult. In the last years several techniques for atrial activity estimation and analysis have been proposed in the literature [78,79,80] Nevertheless, Langley et al compared three of these techniques, namely, spatiotemporal QRST cancellation, blind source separation, and principal component analysis, and determined that there were no significant differences between the atrial frequencies estimated by any of these techniques [81].…”
Section: Techniques For Atrial Activity Analysis From the Electrocardmentioning
confidence: 99%