2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography volume registration in the detection of mandibular alveolar bone defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study revealed that, there was a statistically significant difference among the three radiographic methods when ProTaper Gold instruments were used, where the CBCT radiographic method showed the statistically significant highest mean canal transportation. The results of the present study were in agreement with previous studies which found that CBCT provides a more accurate detection of hard tissue minimal changes (11,13) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study revealed that, there was a statistically significant difference among the three radiographic methods when ProTaper Gold instruments were used, where the CBCT radiographic method showed the statistically significant highest mean canal transportation. The results of the present study were in agreement with previous studies which found that CBCT provides a more accurate detection of hard tissue minimal changes (11,13) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, CBCT was used to evaluate the dentin thickness and root canals of the selected mandibular molars. This technique permits visualization of the root canal system in three planes (axial-coronal-sagittal) that provide the most accurate pre and post-instrumentation measurements of the root canal transportation, centering abilities of the instruments used during treatment and analyse the amount of dentin removed during endodontic treatment (13,35,36) . These measurements were compared to the measurements obtained from the conventional and digital radiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some articles were excluded after full-text review for the following reasons: Lack of data referring to BBT [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 ], measurement not by (CB)CT scan [ 69 ] patients matching the exclusion criteria [ 19 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ], patients with implants [ 85 ], patients without teeth [ 86 ], data not displayed as mean and SD [ 56 ], site or kind of measurement not adequate [ 19 , 62 , 64 , 77 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method used for this purpose is digital subtract radiography, which has been reported to reveal as small as 5% mineral loss with high accuracy. 30 However, the use of this method is limited due to the projection geometry. 31 FDA, in comparison, is an alternative to this method as it is not affected by the projection geometry 32 , and its use has increased in recent years for the evaluation of the trabecular structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%