Comparing Green Economy in Iran with OECD Asian Countries by Applying TOPSIS and GI Method

Ajripour, Iman; Alamian, Rosa

doi:10.18096/tmp.2021.02.02

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Saira Naseer has assessed green economic efficiency in china using AHP, and the research indicates that the AHP model reduces uncertainty and shortcoming in the evaluation process [4]. Research comparing the green economy in Iran with OECD countries strongly suggests using some other MCDM techniques such as AHP, ELECTRE, and Fuzzy MCDM [5]. Piwowarski Mateusz used TOPSIS and VIKOR methods to study sustainable development in EU countries [6].…”

Section: A Identification Of Suitable Green Growth Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Best Performing Top 10 Economies Based on OECD Green Growth Indicators: Using AHP, TOPSIS and Regression

Mughees¹,

Ayaz²

2022

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rapid economic growth is often accompanied by environmental depletion. Recent years have witnessed green growth as a renowned efficient approach to tracking the progress towards sustainable development. Green growth is imperative with the current energy depletion rate and environmental crisis. Green indicators and statistics can measure environmentally sustainable development; thus, they evaluate green growth and support its integration into policy. This study uses MCDM (Multi-criteria decision-making) techniques and OECD indicators for the world’s top 10 economies to evaluate their green growth. This research aims to rank the top 10 economies according to green growth. The top-ranked best-performing country will be further analyzed to assess its renewable energy production.

show abstract

Section: A Identification Of Suitable Green Growth Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Best Performing Top 10 Economies Based on OECD Green Growth Indicators: Using AHP, TOPSIS and Regression

Mughees¹,

Ayaz²

2022

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main steps of the TOPSIS method are as follows (Ajripour et al, 2019;Sedghiyan et al, 2021;Ajripour & Alamian, 2021):…”

Section: Topsismentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying a hybrid MCDM technique in warehouse management

Ajripour

2022

Veztud

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main goal of this study is to apply Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) in managing a warehouse. One of the elements that could impact organization performance is warehouse management. Surplus inventory imposes some ad- ditional costs on the organization, and inadequate inventory stops the operation of an organization. For managing and controlling warehouse inventories, the MCDM method is recommended in this study. The inventories are categorized ba- sed on multi-criteria instead of a single criterion in ABC. To specify the criteria’s weight, Best-Worst Method is used, and to reach the final score of spare parts, the Analytical Hierarchy Process, and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution is applied. Some strategies for managing and controlling organizations’ warehouse is recommended.

show abstract

Evaluation of the Environmental and Economic Performance of Eastern European Countries with the Integrated CRITIC-TOPSIS Method

Akandere

Zerenler

2022

Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Çevre performansının ekonomik performans ile olan ilişkisi oldukça önemlidir. Literatürde ülkelerin çevre performanslarının ekonomik performanslarını anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) teknikleri ile, Çevre Performans Endeksi Doğu Avrupa kümesinde yer alan ülkelerin performansının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Literatürde, bütünleşik CRITIC-TOPSIS yönteminin Çevre Performans Endeksi Doğu Avrupa kümesinde yer alan ülkelerin çevresel ve ekonomik performanslarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılması sebebiyle literatüre katkı sağlaması hedeflenmektedir. CRITIC yöntemi ile belirlenmesi sonucunda en yüksek değerli kriterin ekosistem hizmetleri ve en düşük değerli kriterin Ekosistem canlılığı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Çevresel ve ekonomik performans değerlendirilmesi sonucu Romanya’nın en iyi, Bosna ve Hersek’in ise en kötü değere sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir.

show abstract

Comparing Green Economy in Iran with OECD Asian Countries by Applying TOPSIS and GI Method

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Assessment of Best Performing Top 10 Economies Based on OECD Green Growth Indicators: Using AHP, TOPSIS and Regression

Assessment of Best Performing Top 10 Economies Based on OECD Green Growth Indicators: Using AHP, TOPSIS and Regression

Applying a hybrid MCDM technique in warehouse management

Evaluation of the Environmental and Economic Performance of Eastern European Countries with the Integrated CRITIC-TOPSIS Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About