2000
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Contrast-Enhanced Breath-Hold MR Angiography and Conventional Angiography

Abstract: Dynamic breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared favorably with conventional angiography in preoperative assessment of the proximal mesenteric arteries and in the evaluation of portal hypertension; however, conventional angiography is still necessary to evaluate distal arteries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Good agreement was observed between findings at angiography and those at gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of arterial abnormalities (Fig 3b, 3c) (13,26). Three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequences allow evaluation of the liver parenchyma as well as the hepatic vessels.…”
Section: Hepatic Arterymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Good agreement was observed between findings at angiography and those at gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of arterial abnormalities (Fig 3b, 3c) (13,26). Three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequences allow evaluation of the liver parenchyma as well as the hepatic vessels.…”
Section: Hepatic Arterymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although Meaney et al 32 and Ernst et al 33 showed that the technique can be used to assess mesenteric arterial circulation, Rodgers et al 34 used the technique to assess the portal venous system. Stafford-Johnson et al 35 showed that 3D MRA is capable of showing vascular complications after liver transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another more accurate morphological assessment of the portal venous system, such as 3D contrast-enhanced MR portography, 31 is also reported. However, we believe functional quantitative parameters may be more subjective than qualitative morphological assessment.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance In Medical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%