2014
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmm.13.1.013005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of various release methods for gold surface micromachining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Packaging contributes to about 75% of the total cost of a device [1] and the performance and reliability of a device strongly depend on its packaging. The diverse nature of MEMS devices also makes it mandatory to customize the packaging to the specific requirements of devices and applications, with emphasis on the cost, performance, and reliability [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Packaging contributes to about 75% of the total cost of a device [1] and the performance and reliability of a device strongly depend on its packaging. The diverse nature of MEMS devices also makes it mandatory to customize the packaging to the specific requirements of devices and applications, with emphasis on the cost, performance, and reliability [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also results in longer signal lines and larger wafer area consumption. Depending upon the electrical connection approach, the vertical packaging can further be subdivided as top contact packaging (TCP, the conventional approach) [11][12][13][14][15] and bottom contact packaging (BCP) as shown in Figures 2(b) and (c) respectively. In vertical packaging, connections are provided either through the cap or device wafer in a direction perpendicular to the wafer and no lateral extension is required, thus saving the wafer area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%