Comparative study of the flexural properties of ABS, PLA and a PLA–wood composite manufactured through fused filament fabrication

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper is to analyze the mechanical properties of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) parts manufactured through fused filament fabrication and compare these results to analogous ones obtained on polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA–wood specimens to contribute for a wider understanding of the different materials used for additive manufacturing. Design/methodology/approach With that aim, an experimental based on an L27 Taguchi array was used to combine the specific parameters taken into account in the study, namely, layer height, nozzle diameter, infill density, orientation and printing velocity. All samples were subjected to a four-point bending test performed according to the ASTM D6272 standard. Findings Young’s modulus, elastic limit, maximum stress and maximum deformation of every sample were computed and subjected to an analysis of variance. Results prove that layer height and nozzle diameter are the most significant factors that affect the mechanical resistance in pieces generated through additive manufacturing and subjected to bending loads, regardless of the material. Practical implications The best results were obtained by combining a layer height of 0.1 mm and a nozzle diameter of 0.6 mm. The comparison of materials evidenced that PLA and its composite version reinforced with wood particles present more rigidity than ABS, whereas the latter can experience further deflection before break. Originality/value This study is of interest for manufacturers that want to decide which is the best material to be applied for their application, as it derives in a practical technical recommendation of the best parameters that should be selected to treat the material during the fused filament fabrication process.

Fabrication of 3D Printed Poly(lactic acid)/Polycaprolactone Scaffolds Using TGF-β1 for Promoting Bone Regeneration

“…The technique of AM can be applied not only for production using other optimized methods in design but also prototyping including ideal support, ideal topology and options of partial consolidation and partial orientation [8]. AM procedures are also known as 3-dimensional (3D) printing, an improvement of techniques that decades ago permitted the construction of flat pieces from digital files [9]. The 3D printed structures are manufactured layer-by-layer with an injected cement or biomaterials [10,11].…”

Manufacturing and Application of 3D Printed Photo Fenton Reactors for Wastewater Treatment

“…The last one is printed with greater difficulty than the previous ones, but by increasing the extruder diameter and decreasing the layer height [ 47 ], the problem is solved. The stiffness in the case of ABS decreased compared to PLA and Timberfill ® [ 48 ]. Print using a heated bed is only necessary in the case of ABS.…”

Mechanical Performance of 3D-Printed Biocompatible Polycarbonate for Biomechanical Applications

“…However, to precisely define its application areas, it is necessary to understand its mechanical performance thoroughly. It has already been shown in previous studies with engineering-grade polymers [28][29][30] that the variability of its properties is highly dependent on printing conditions. It may even be essential to use a solvent to eliminate the support material necessary to print highly complex geometric structures such as those proposed for this type of application, without this implying a deterioration of the mechanical behaviour [31,32].…”