2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-010-5926-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of hydroxyapatite and octacalcium phosphate coatings deposited on metallic implants by PLD method

Abstract: The aim of the presented study was an analysis of two apatite coatings: hydroxyapatite (HA) and octacalcium phosphate (OCP) as coatings materials for metallic implants. Both layers were deposited by means of the PLD method. As a target material, synthetic, powdered and pressed hydroxyapatite was used. HA was deposited on 316L steel substrate in two temperature ranges for obtaining different coatings: 150 ± 30°C and 430 ± 30°C for OCP and HA, respectively. As an intermediate layer, the nanocrystalline diamond l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high resolution AFM topography imaging of the samples (Fig. 3 a, c, e noted that a similar structure of the coatings was previously noted in [42,43]. This is consistent with current physical models of PLD, as during the nanosecond laser ablation the gas plasma cloud is composed of ions and large clusters, which can be further integrated due to intense collisions during the motion of the plasma cloud from the target to the substrate [32], [44].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The high resolution AFM topography imaging of the samples (Fig. 3 a, c, e noted that a similar structure of the coatings was previously noted in [42,43]. This is consistent with current physical models of PLD, as during the nanosecond laser ablation the gas plasma cloud is composed of ions and large clusters, which can be further integrated due to intense collisions during the motion of the plasma cloud from the target to the substrate [32], [44].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is in accordance with previous studies showing a more pronounced osteoblast attachment to an HA surface as compared to an OCP surface. Besides the difference in chemical composition and degradation properties, these two materials exhibited different grain size, which could also be of influence on cell attachment [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The favorable effect of gelatin for producing the least soluble phases (HAP and OCP) in trial SBF-5 may be partially explained by the relatively higher viscosity induced in the mixing solutions, which under no stirring significantly affected the kinetics of the nucleation of HAP [1, 67,75]. As brushite and OCP are intermediate phases [33,86,87], a role for gelatin in this ionic reaction could be diffusion-controlling, favoring the time-demanding precipitation of the end product. On the other hand, in the trials with disodium phosphate (DSP), almost pure brushite was the product under stirring (trial SBF-1), while HAP with a minor amount of brushite was formed with no stirring (trial SBF-2).…”
Section: Sbf-based Wet Synthesis Of Hapmentioning
confidence: 99%