2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2345243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative studies on the stability of polymer versus SiO2 gate dielectrics for pentacene thin-film transistors

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inLow-voltage-operated top-gate polymer thin-film transistors with high capacitance poly(vinylidene fluoridetrifluoroethylene)/poly(methyl methacrylate) dielectrics A comparative study of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor gate dielectrics for solution-processed polymer thinfilm transistor circuit integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of small V T shift may be attributed to the expulsion of interface trapped electrons, which are regarded as still remaining at the pentacene/dielectric interface in a small density. [25][26][27][28] For the transparent ZnO TFT, the saturation field-effect mobility was 0.21 cm 2 V À1 s À1 and its V T was 0.2 V. In the case of our top-gate ZnO TFT, no hysteresis and no V T shift were observed at all, which is very impressive compared to the results from our previous bottom-gate ZnO TFT. [14] When the same transfer curves for the two TFT devices are displayed as I D (logarithmic scale) versus V G plots in Figure 4c and d, the on/off current ratios of the pentacene and ZnO TFTs are 2 Â 10 5 and 2.7 Â 10 3 , respectively, with subthreshold swing (S.S. ¼ dV G /dlog 10 I D ) values of 0.22 and 0.58 V decade À1 , respectively.…”
Section: Channelsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This type of small V T shift may be attributed to the expulsion of interface trapped electrons, which are regarded as still remaining at the pentacene/dielectric interface in a small density. [25][26][27][28] For the transparent ZnO TFT, the saturation field-effect mobility was 0.21 cm 2 V À1 s À1 and its V T was 0.2 V. In the case of our top-gate ZnO TFT, no hysteresis and no V T shift were observed at all, which is very impressive compared to the results from our previous bottom-gate ZnO TFT. [14] When the same transfer curves for the two TFT devices are displayed as I D (logarithmic scale) versus V G plots in Figure 4c and d, the on/off current ratios of the pentacene and ZnO TFTs are 2 Â 10 5 and 2.7 Â 10 3 , respectively, with subthreshold swing (S.S. ¼ dV G /dlog 10 I D ) values of 0.22 and 0.58 V decade À1 , respectively.…”
Section: Channelsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…[60] We have also seen above that strong hysteresis effects are commonly observed with polar gate dielectrics such as PVP [61] or PVA, which are hygroscopic and prone to containing a significant concentration of ions. The hysteresis effects can be reduced by careful crosslinking [62,63] or by inserting an inorganic-barrier layer in contact with the gate electrode. [61,64,65] As discussed above, specific functional groups on the surface of the gate dielectric can trap charges in the organic semiconductor, as in the case of electron trapping in silanol groups or hole trapping in water-related defect states on SiO 2 .…”
Section: Influence Of Gate Dielectric and Source-drain Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that precursor groups (Si-N, Si-H) remaining after conversion and hydroxyl groups on the SiO 2 surface lead to the presence of hysteresis. [30][31][32][33] On the basis of the IR results shown in Fig. 4, we suggest that the hysteresis in the J vs E curves for CAPS and 20 W OCAPS is attributed to incomplete reaction of the PHPS precursor, and that hydroxyl groups generated after plasma treatment introduce hysteresis for 80 W OCAPS films.…”
Section: Morphology and Chemistry Of The Gate Insulatormentioning
confidence: 99%