1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00004902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative life history of female mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis, in tidal freshwater and oligohaline habitats

Abstract: SynopsisFemale Gambusia afinis were collected from low salinity/near-neutral pH and tidal freshwater/low pH localities to document life history variation between these two habitats. Mosquitofish were 2.7 times more abundant in low salinity/near-neutral pH (2.37 5 0.72ppt; pH = 5.73 + 0.11) than in tidal freshwater/low pH (0.27 + 0.19 ppt; pH = 4.46 + 0.18) habitats in Old Fort Bayou, a black-water tidal river of the Biloxi Bay estuary, Mississippi. Fish were common in both areas from June 1985 through February… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
32
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(35 reference statements)
6
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found significant variation in all traits examined, except for the body condition of H. formosa males and females and female P. latipinna (Table 3). Our results are congruent with those of Stearns & Sage (1980) and Brown-Peterson & Peterson (1990) for G. affinis and Trexler & Travis (1990) for P. latipinna. Both the current study and the earlier reports found that females from higher salinity habitats exhibited greater reproductive allotment and fecundity than females collected in nearby lower-salinity sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found significant variation in all traits examined, except for the body condition of H. formosa males and females and female P. latipinna (Table 3). Our results are congruent with those of Stearns & Sage (1980) and Brown-Peterson & Peterson (1990) for G. affinis and Trexler & Travis (1990) for P. latipinna. Both the current study and the earlier reports found that females from higher salinity habitats exhibited greater reproductive allotment and fecundity than females collected in nearby lower-salinity sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We found lower levels of body condition, lowered GSI, and lowered fecundity for G. affinis in fresh marshes, where these fish were most abundant, indicating that greater abundance did not correspond with better condition and higher reproductive capacity. Limited evidence exists from other studies to suggest that freshwater would be more stressful to Gambusia affinis than those salinities observed in intermediate marshes (Stearns & Sage 1980, Brown-Peterson & Peterson 1990). Additionally, Akin & Neill (2004) did report an increase in respiration rates in G. affinis at 0 ppt compared to at 10 ppt (though they did not feel this increased respiration would be stressful to the fish).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Females that mature too late may not survive to reproduce (Kusano, 1982). For many fish species, as also shown in the present study, clutch size is positively correlated with body size of females (Reznick & Miles, 1989;Brown-Peterson & Peterson, 1990). Thus, according to the environmental conditions that a population is facing there are different selective pressures upon the individuals: they may reproduce early with small body size and small clutch, or they may delay sexual maturation and grow to a large body size with a large clutch (see discussion in Kusano, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A similar population structure of G. holbrooki inhabiting watercourses of different degrees of salinity has already been shown by Alcaraz & García-Berthou (2007), although the present study extends the salinity range studied in a natural population up to 49.5 g l -1 . These results point to the good adap tation of the species to environments of different quality (Specziár 2004), as has been described for G. affinis (Brown-Peterson & Peterson 1990).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%