Comparative evaluation of dento-alveolar distraction and periodontal distraction assisted rapid retraction of the maxillary canine: a pilot study

Kharkar, Viraj; Kotrashetti, S.M.; Kulkarni, Poonam R.

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.06.012

Cited by 32 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Kharkar et al 24 revealed that the required time was significantly shorter in the dentoalveolar distraction group than in the periodontal distraction group (12.5 6 0.50 vs 19.5 6 1.70 days, P , .01). Anchorage loss.…”

Section: Dentoalveolar Distraction Vs Periodontal Distractionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Anchorage loss. Kharkar et al 24 showed that the dentoalveolar distraction group presented significantly less anchorage loss in the sagittal plane but significantly more in the vertical plane than in the periodontal distraction group (P , .01 for both).…”

Section: Dentoalveolar Distraction Vs Periodontal Distractionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Dentoalveolar distraction was performed by making monocortical perforations on alveolar bones around canines, followed by distracting canines using distractors; periodontal distraction was performed by making 24 compared left and right sides of the same participant. When the experimental and control sides were assigned, since both experimental and control sides were in the same participant, the assignment would not change.…”

Section: Description Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Canine distraction (0.5 mm/d) was achieved by sliding the anterior segment toward the posterior segment. One study 24 compared the effectiveness of the two techniques.…”

Section: Description Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…a Kharkar et al 2010 24 did not measure tooth moved distances but the time required to move the tooth to its destination.…”

Section: Kharkar Et Al 2010mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

Long

Pyakurel

Wang

et al. 2012

The Angle Orthodontist

175

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Materials and Methods: We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index, CENTRAL, and SIGLE from January 1990 to August 2011 for randomized or quasirandomized controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. The processes of study search, selection, and quality assessment were conducted independently in duplicate by two review authors. Original outcome data, if possible, underwent statistical pooling by using Review Manager 5. Results: Through a predefined search strategy, we finally included nine eligible studies. Among them, five interventions were studied (ie, low-level laser therapy, corticotomy, electrical current, pulsed electromagnetic fields, and dentoalveolar or periodontal distraction). Six outcomes were evaluated in these studies (ie, accumulative moved distance or movement rate, time required to move tooth to its destination, anchorage loss, periodontal health, pulp vitality, and root resorption). Conclusion: Among the five interventions, corticotomy is effective and safe to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, low-level laser therapy was unable to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, current evidence does not reveal whether electrical current and pulsed electromagnetic fields are effective in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement, and dentoalveolar or periodontal distraction is promising in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement but lacks convincing evidence. (Angle Orthod. 2013;83:164-171.)

show abstract

Section: Dentoalveolar Distraction Vs Periodontal Distractionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Dentoalveolar Distraction Vs Periodontal Distractionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Description Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Canine distraction (0.5 mm/d) was achieved by sliding the anterior segment toward the posterior segment. One study 24 compared the effectiveness of the two techniques.…”

Section: Description Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…a Kharkar et al 2010 24 did not measure tooth moved distances but the time required to move the tooth to its destination.…”

Section: Kharkar Et Al 2010mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

Long

Pyakurel

Wang

et al. 2012

The Angle Orthodontist

175

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment

Fleming

Fedorowicz²,

El‐Angbawi

et al. 2015

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundA range of surgical and non-surgical techniques have received increasing attention in recent years in an effort to reduce the duration of a course of orthodontic treatment. Various surgical techniques have been used; however, uncertainty exists in relation to the effectiveness of these procedures and the possible adverse effects related to them. ObjectivesTo assess the effects of surgically assisted orthodontics on the duration and outcome of orthodontic treatment.

show abstract

Effect of orthodontic force on the expression of PI3K, Akt, and P70S6 K in the human periodontal ligament during orthodontic loading

Shen

Muhammed

et al. 2017

Cell Biochemistry & Function

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an atypical serine/threonine protein kinases involved in the regulation of cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/P70S6 K signalling pathway. P70S6 K as a downstream molecule of mTOR is activated by phosphorylation and subsequently promotes the synthesis of ribosomal and translational proteins. In this study, we investigated the role of PI3K, Akt, and P70S6 K in human periodontal tissue remodelling during orthodontic loading. The prepared tissue specimens taken from 4 extracted premolars were processed for immunolabelling. The changes in the expression of PI3K, Akt, and P70S6 K in the periodontal tissues were detected by real-time quantitative-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis. The results from real-time quantitative-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot both showed that the expression of PI3K, Akt, and P70S6 K in the experimental group began to increase at 3 days and increased significantly at 10 days, then decreased approaching the control group level at 28 days. Our findings showed that the expression of PI3K, Akt, and P70S6 K in human periodontal ligament demonstrated a variability during the orthodontic loading, which suggested that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/P70S6 K signal pathway was involved in orthodontic tooth movement and played a role in the process of periodontium remodelling.

show abstract

Comparative evaluation of dento-alveolar distraction and periodontal distraction assisted rapid retraction of the maxillary canine: a pilot study

Cited by 32 publications

References 13 publications

Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment

Effect of orthodontic force on the expression of PI3K, Akt, and P70S6 K in the human periodontal ligament during orthodontic loading

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About