2011
DOI: 10.4303/bda/d110154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Bioactivity Study of 45S5 and 58S Bioglasses in Organic and Inorganic Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,25,28,30 However, no systematic and insightful assessments have been performed yet to shed light on the complex processes involved and their causality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,25,28,30 However, no systematic and insightful assessments have been performed yet to shed light on the complex processes involved and their causality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Similar yet incomplete questions have been raised by a small number of researchers. 14,15,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Our studies are among the pioneering works on complex biomimetic testing solutions containing organic/inorganic components. 31,32 The subject gained more traction after the interrogative work of two leading scientists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we measured the release of calcium from GC8 particles for several days. Also, since the type of media can influence degradation rate of bioglasses/glass-ceramics, we used CCM and buffered MilliQ water [6668]. Despite achieving a sustained release for several days, calcium release was slower in CCM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite achieving a sustained release for several days, calcium release was slower in CCM. This slower release could be have been caused by the organic content of CCM, which has been reported to interfere in the degradation of bioglasses [68]. Alternatively, precipitation of a layer of calcium phosphate on the surface of the particle could also have contributed to the reduced release in CCM [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the bioactivity of quenched samples increases and bioactivity of unquenched ones decreases when the concentration of BSA increases from 10 to 20, because the method of quenching affected the bioactivity of samples due to different porosity. Since the porosity of quenched bioactive glass-ceramics were higher than unquenched ones, the interaction between the quenched samples and BSA in higher concentration of Ringer's solution with BSA was higher than that between unquenched ones and BSA [39]. …”
Section: Xrd Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%