Comparative Assessment of SSR and AFLP Markers for Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Conservation of Fig, Ficus carica L., Genetic Resources in Tunisia

Abstract

This study characterises the genetic variability of fig, Ficus carica L., using simple sequence repeat (SSR) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. It compares the efficiency and utility of the two techniques in detecting variation and establishing genetic relationships among Tunisian fig cultivars.Our results show that using both marker systems, the Tunisian fig germ plasm is characterised by having a large genetic diversity at the deoxyribonucleic acid level, as most of AFLP bands were detected and all SSR markers were polymorphic. In fact, 351 (342 polymorphic) and 57 (57 polymorphic) bands were detected using AFLP and SSR primers, respectively. SSR markers were the most polymorphic with an average polymorphic information content value of 0.94, while AFLP markers showed the highest effective multiplex ratio (56.9) and marker index (45.2). The effective marker index was recorded highest (4.19) for AFLP markers and lowest (0.70) for the SSR ones. Our results demonstrate that (1) independent as well as combined analyses of cluster analyses of SSR and AFLP fragments showed that cultivars are clustered independently from their geographical origin, horticultural classifications and tree sex; (2) the analysis of molecular variance allowed the partitioning of genetic variation within and among fig groups and showed greater variation within groups and (3) AFLP and SSR markers datasets showed positive correlation. This study suggests the SSR and AFLP markers are suitable for diversity analysis and cultivars fingerprinting. An understanding of the genetic diversity and population structure of F. carica in Tunisia can also provide insight into the conservation and management of this species.

Assessments of Biodiversity Based on Molecular Markers and Morphological Traits among West-Bank, Palestine Fig Genotypes (Ficus carica L.)

“…For the remaining genotypes, the genetic distance matrix showed a high level of divergence at the DNA level. Similar result was reported by Baraket [32].…”

Morphological and Pomological Diversity of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars in Northwest of Tunisia

“…Pomological and morphological traits as well as molecular markers were used to analyse genetic diversity and characterize local cultivars [8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Recently, …”

Microsatellite polymorphism in Tunisian pomegranates (Punica granatum L.): Cultivar genotyping and identification

“…With only five primers, it was possible to discriminate among all landraces studied, identifying 103 alleles and 155 different genotypes. In fig (F. carica L.), six SSR primers permitted to discriminate among 72 Tunisian local varieties with a resolving power of 97.2% (Saddoud et al, 2007;Baraket et al, 2010), the tested primers revealed 58 alleles and 124 genotypes. An identification key for 26 Tunisian olives (Olea europaea L.) was successful established for discriminating among local cultivars using three of ten SSR markers by Taamalli et al (2008).…”