2019
DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1609189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community perspectives on the environmental impacts of Arctic shipping: Case studies from Russia, Norway and Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this review also align with existing studies that describe increasing shipping in the opening Arctic as a new concern Polar Record for coastal communities (see, for example, Davydov & Mikhailova, 2011;Dawson et al, 2020;Dawson, Stewart, Johnston, & Lemieux, 2016;Olsen, Carter, & Dawson, 2019;Olsen, Hovelsrud, & Kaltenborn, 2020;Stewart et al, 2015). Shipping development brings new (usually seasonal) economic opportunities to communities, which, in combination with other factors, may present a trade-off.…”
Section: Understanding Adaptive Capacity Through Shipping Growthsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results of this review also align with existing studies that describe increasing shipping in the opening Arctic as a new concern Polar Record for coastal communities (see, for example, Davydov & Mikhailova, 2011;Dawson et al, 2020;Dawson, Stewart, Johnston, & Lemieux, 2016;Olsen, Carter, & Dawson, 2019;Olsen, Hovelsrud, & Kaltenborn, 2020;Stewart et al, 2015). Shipping development brings new (usually seasonal) economic opportunities to communities, which, in combination with other factors, may present a trade-off.…”
Section: Understanding Adaptive Capacity Through Shipping Growthsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Hansel et al (2020) caution, however, that after 2050 ocean acidification combined with other stressors could push the North‐East Arctic cod fishery, a large commercial fishery and cornerstone for communities in northern Norway, to collapse even with adaptation efforts. Few studies examine how these potential opportunities are perceived by communities, or factors affecting the ability to capitalize on them, with research mostly on the regional scale (Ng et al, 2018) (exceptions include Dawson et al, 2020; Olsen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Arctic Societies Are Resilient But Vulnerabilities Are Emergingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the shipping growth in the Arctic with sea ice decline is associated with oil and gas service vessels and tankers, marine cruises, and fisheries, bringing opportunities for economic development and diversification, varying by local context and geography (Olsen et al, 2019(Olsen et al, , 2021Petrick et al, 2017;Silber & Adams, 2019). Projections suggest, for example, that by 2040 the ice will have receded enough to make gas production feasible in the European offshore Arctic under most emission scenarios (Petrick et al, 2017), increased cruise ship tourism offers opportunities for community economic development if well managed (Dawson et al, 2016;Eduard, 2018;Halliday et al, 2018), and opportunities for commercial fisheries are expected to increase with Lam et al (2016) projecting that total fisheries revenue in the Arctic may increase by 39% by 2050 relative to 2000.…”
Section: Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tourist boom in Longyearbyen in the past two decades can be explained by the growing interest in the Arctic in general and in Svalbard in particular, by national and local facilitation of tourism, and by easier access because of reduced sea ice cover (Hovelsrud et al, 2020;Palma et al, 2019). With retreating sea ice, the tourism industry offers trips to new and previously inaccessible areas, and the cruise ship season is extended (Bystrowska, 2019;Olsen, Carter, & Dawson, 2019;Stocker, Renner, & Knol-Kauffman, 2020;Øian & Kaltenborn, 2020). On-land tourism increasingly offers year-around attractions.…”
Section: Svalbard's Changing Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%