2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2004.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating uncertainty: lessons learned and suggestions for climate change assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
106
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the TAR defined the meaning of words used to describe probabilities did not appear to influence how people then interpreted those words (Patt and Schrag 2003;Patt and Dessai 2005;Patt et al 2004). More precisely, these authors found that among a sample of COP 9 participants, the numerical interpretation of "unlikely, perhaps very unlikely" climate change did not depend on whether they had read the IPCC TAR.…”
Section: Ipcc Typologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the TAR defined the meaning of words used to describe probabilities did not appear to influence how people then interpreted those words (Patt and Schrag 2003;Patt and Dessai 2005;Patt et al 2004). More precisely, these authors found that among a sample of COP 9 participants, the numerical interpretation of "unlikely, perhaps very unlikely" climate change did not depend on whether they had read the IPCC TAR.…”
Section: Ipcc Typologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such individual and collective interpretations of risks lead to decisions about why and how we live in landscapes of uncertainty (Thompson and Warburton 1985;Macnaghten 2003;Robbins and Moore 2013). Uncertainty tends to be categorised as epistemic -derived from incomplete knowledge, or aleatory -a product of intrinsic natural variability (sometimes called 'natural stochastic uncertainty', or 'variability uncertainty') (Walker et al 2003;Patt and Dessai 2005; van Asselt and Vos 2006). In the climate change literature, aleatory uncertainty is part of a category of 'unknowable knowledge', which includes the 'human reflexive uncertainty' in response to climatic change and the uncertain outcomes of such actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the scientist in governance is therefore also a growing research field in its own right. Patt and Dessai (2005) and Grothmann and Patt (2005), operating in the climate adaptation context, have looked at the role of experts and the effect of uncertainty in expert assessments on citizens' choices in response to perceived risks. It is essential but not necessarily sufficient to follow good practice in risk communication, and deliver training in technical or cognitive skills to those receiving the complex messages of environmental risk assessment.…”
Section: Reflexivity In Research and Governance Of Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%