2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating clearly about conservation corridors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
74
0
16

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
74
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…In sharp contrast, the USFWS at the STRC has a clear plan to establish five wildlife corridors with viable connections of key protected habitats in the United States and Mexico. Well-defined goals of corridors need to be expressed in the context of six ecological functions that can be very species specific; a corridor can represent a conduit, a habitat, a filter, a barrier, a source, and (or) a sink, or a combination depending on its dimensions, location, and habitat quality (Hess and Fischer, 2001). A recent meta-analysis of 35 studies demonstrated that movement of organisms increased about 50 percent between habitats connected by corridors; movements were more evident for plants, invertebrates, and nonbird vertebrates than for bird species (Gilbert-Norton and others, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sharp contrast, the USFWS at the STRC has a clear plan to establish five wildlife corridors with viable connections of key protected habitats in the United States and Mexico. Well-defined goals of corridors need to be expressed in the context of six ecological functions that can be very species specific; a corridor can represent a conduit, a habitat, a filter, a barrier, a source, and (or) a sink, or a combination depending on its dimensions, location, and habitat quality (Hess and Fischer, 2001). A recent meta-analysis of 35 studies demonstrated that movement of organisms increased about 50 percent between habitats connected by corridors; movements were more evident for plants, invertebrates, and nonbird vertebrates than for bird species (Gilbert-Norton and others, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Son intérêt vient: (a) de l'impossibilité d'étendre le système de grands parcs à tout le territoire, (b) de la pertinence d'établir des réseaux écologiques qui permettent la complémentarité des écosystèmes différents (Forman & Godron, 1986;Hess & Fischer, 2001), (c) de la réduction de la vulnérabilité des différentes réserves du réseau aux catastrophes naturelles (Carrière et al, 2008). Plus précisément, cette stratégie tient compte du fait que: (a) certaines espèces ne peuvent survivre que dans une seule et importante réserve dont la fragmentation réduirait fortement leur potentiel d'adaptation, (b) un réseau d'habitat permettrait atténuer l'extinction des espèces en permettant de recoloniser des parcelles vides par la migration (Hess & Fischer, 2001;Ovaskainen, 2002 (Carrière et al, 2008, p. 102-103).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In addition, surrounding landscape structure, such as the presence of forest patches and isolated trees, can promote the arrival of seeds in hedgerows (Harvey 2000). Hess & Fischer (2001) have suggested that corridors can serve as conduits, barriers, or habitats, among other functions. Propagules of some animal-dispersed species may be deposited in the corridor, indicating that seed dispersal may not reach the ends of long corridors; thus such plant species must establish and reproduce within the corridor to complete dispersal in subsequent generations (Beier & Loe 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%