2017
DOI: 10.1590/1983-80422017251167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comitês de ética em pesquisa no Brasil: estudo com coordenadores

Abstract: This study aimed to characterize the Research Ethics Committees in their profile and operationalization. An electronic questionnaire was sent to the 645 existing committees at the time and answered by 129 coordinators. The answers were categorized by frequency and mean of the answers and passed by a statistical test. The results indicated that most of the coordinators had a degree in Biological and Health Sciences, at Masters and PhD levels. The committees had been operating for more than nine years in higher … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1
18

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
3
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though there was a predominance of members of the biomedical area (57%), the percentage values are proportional and without hegemony of any profession, reflecting greater participation of the various categories. The higher proportion of nursing professionals differs from other studies conducted in Brazil and the number of degrees found indicates greater diversity and multidisciplinary in the RECs, a fact that raises the level of participation and understanding perspectives of the projects reviewed [ 21 , 23 ]. However, this diversity may increase the difficulty to review clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Even though there was a predominance of members of the biomedical area (57%), the percentage values are proportional and without hegemony of any profession, reflecting greater participation of the various categories. The higher proportion of nursing professionals differs from other studies conducted in Brazil and the number of degrees found indicates greater diversity and multidisciplinary in the RECs, a fact that raises the level of participation and understanding perspectives of the projects reviewed [ 21 , 23 ]. However, this diversity may increase the difficulty to review clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Los aspectos técnicos y científicos no deben separarse de los aspectos bioéticos de la investigación científica. Los CEIs y los organismos reguladores evalúan y monitorean el desarrollo de los estudios, verifican la idoneidad del investigador y de las instituciones ejecutantes y todos los actores son responsables de garantizar que la investigación aplique principios éticos y calidad técnica 27,28 . De igual forma, demandan respuestas efectivas ante las potenciales situaciones que puedan presentarse a los participantes, y que se hagan efectivos los aspectos descritos en los consentimientos informados.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Os dados sociodemográficos dos participantes do estudo apontam para maioria de membros de CEP do gênero masculino e formação em diferentes áreas do conhecimento, embora com predomínio da área de saúde, o que sugere a existência de composição não equilibrada dos membros. Tais dados corroboram estudos sobre a temática e que também apontaram existência de desequilíbrio na composição de CEP quanto ao gênero e à categoria profissional (1,(13)(14) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Os Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa (CEPs) são órgãos responsáveis pela apreciação de protocolos de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos submetidos à Plataforma Brasil, oriundos de instituições públicas e particulares. Têm por finalidade a defesa e a proteção dos direitos dos participantes da pesquisa (1) . Desse modo, os CEPs são instâncias de consulta obrigatória para que pesquisas científicas que envolvam seres humanos possam ser iniciadas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified