2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(99)00293-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combustion modeling of turbulent jet diffusion H2/air flame with detailed chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature distributions and the maximum levels in the combustor and the average levels at the combustor exit show similar trends with the experimental results [11][12][13][14][15] and other numerical works [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The overall flame temperature decreases as methane is added to the fuel because of the lower energy input.…”
Section: Modelling Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Temperature distributions and the maximum levels in the combustor and the average levels at the combustor exit show similar trends with the experimental results [11][12][13][14][15] and other numerical works [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The overall flame temperature decreases as methane is added to the fuel because of the lower energy input.…”
Section: Modelling Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Due to the difficulty in DNS simulations and heavy task in computation, in the first step, a 2D square computa- [25] involving strong turbulence-chemistry interactions. The grid in DNS should capture the Kolmogrov micro scale eddies η = (v 3 /ε) 1/4 , where v is the kinematic viscosity,and ε is the dissipation rate of the turbulence energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of L x is 100 times greater than the hydraulic diameter. Value of L y , and L z , for acceptable free boundary condition, were selected 20 times longer than hydraulic diameter in the y-direction and z-direction [21,22]. In this geometry, e-a-b-f and c-a-b-d, are symmetry planes and b-d-h-f is outlet with fully developed boundary condition.…”
Section: Numerical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%