2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining genome-wide association analyses and gene interaction networks to reveal new genes associated with carcass traits, meat quality and fatty acid profiles in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of genotyping using the Illumina 50K SNP chip showed that only about 68% of the assayed SNPs are polymorphic for this breed, which is in accordance with other studies with local cattle breeds that were not included in the SNP chip discovery panel [14,17], and indicate that ascertainment bias may be a concern when SNP chips are applied to minor breeds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of genotyping using the Illumina 50K SNP chip showed that only about 68% of the assayed SNPs are polymorphic for this breed, which is in accordance with other studies with local cattle breeds that were not included in the SNP chip discovery panel [14,17], and indicate that ascertainment bias may be a concern when SNP chips are applied to minor breeds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This was carried out based on the information reported for humans and only cattle orthologous genes were considered for the networks. The Reactome database was used ( ) to perform analyses of pathway enrichment as described in [ 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To better understand the genetic basis for variation in phenotypic traits in local pig breeds, several genome-wide association studies focused on detecting possible associations of loci with different phenotypic attributes, such as morphological, production or meat quality traits (11)(12)(13)(14). However, these studies worked with small number of samples, increasing the risk to give false negative results due to low statistical power (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%