1970
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183x001000060036x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Ability Estimates in Arachis hypogaea L. II. Field Performance of F1 Hybrids1

Abstract: Estimates of heterosis and combining ability were made using 15 hybrid combinations grown under field conditions. The hybrids were produced by crossing in diallel six peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) lines collected from three geographic areas of South America.Of 17 characters, estimates of specific combining ability were significant for 16 and estimates of general combining ability were significant for 8. Specific combining ability was greater for yield and for most fruit characters.Several of the crosses showed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
92
1
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
92
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mh and Hh were calculated using the following formulas (Özgen, 1989;Budak and Yıldırım, 1996;Beche et al, 2013). Hp (F1ij) where Mh ij is the heterosis of the ijth cross; Hh ij is the heterobeltiosis of the ijth cross; F 1ij is the mean of the ijth The t-test was used to determine whether F 1 hybrid means were statistically significant for Mh and Hh means as follows (Wynne et al, 1970):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mh and Hh were calculated using the following formulas (Özgen, 1989;Budak and Yıldırım, 1996;Beche et al, 2013). Hp (F1ij) where Mh ij is the heterosis of the ijth cross; Hh ij is the heterobeltiosis of the ijth cross; F 1ij is the mean of the ijth The t-test was used to determine whether F 1 hybrid means were statistically significant for Mh and Hh means as follows (Wynne et al, 1970):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variances for general combining ability and specific combining ability were tested against their respective error variances derived from ANOVA reduced to mean level. Significance test for GCA and SCA effects were performed using t-test as suggested by Cochran and Cox (1950) and Wynne et al (1970).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of heterosis over the mid parent and better parent were calculated. A "t" test was used to evaluate the difference of F 1 means from the respective mid parent and better parent values, following the method as delineated by Wynne et al (1970).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%