SAE Technical Paper Series 2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-1171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Cycle for Hybrid Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat transfer coefficient outside the evaporator pipe can be also obtained by Equation (4). Considering the phase change in the tube, different correlations are used for the convective heat transfer coefficient inside tube.…”
Section: Bρ E2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heat transfer coefficient outside the evaporator pipe can be also obtained by Equation (4). Considering the phase change in the tube, different correlations are used for the convective heat transfer coefficient inside tube.…”
Section: Bρ E2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, under the different working conditions of ICEs, the exhaust gas temperature of light-duty engines varies from 500 to 900˝C and that of heavy-duty engines is in the range of 400 to 650˝C [2,3]. The investigation conducted by Chammas and Clodic [4] has shown that the available exhaust gas energy varies greatly depending on engine conditions for a typical light duty engine. A similar conclusion was obtained by Ringler [5] and Teng [6] based on a medium duty engine and typical truck diesel engine, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a Spark Ignition with 1.4 L ICE and thermal efficiency of 15-32%, wastes 1.7-45 kW of energy through radiator coolant and 4.6-120 kW of through exhaust gas [5]. During the past decades, many researchers have conducted different configurations of Rankine Cycles by using different working fluids to improve the systems' performance [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this trend, new vehicle technologies must be introduced to achieve better fuel economy consumption without increasing harmful gaseous emissions. For internal combustion engine (ICE) in most typical gasoline fuelled vehicles, for a typical 2.0 L gasoline engine used in passenger cars, it was estimated that 21% of the fuel energy is wasted through the exhaust at the most common load and speed range [1]. The rest of the fuel energy is lost in the form of waste heat in the coolant, as well as friction and parasitic losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%