2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colour degradation and quality parameters of sonicated orange juice using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
90
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(37 reference statements)
12
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…L*, a*and b* values gradually increased with treatment time increase. Tiwari et al (2008) studied the visual color of sonicated orange juice and found that the color values changed with treatment time increase. In particular, a sharp increase of the b* value was reported when orange juice was treated with ultrasound for 10 min, which is similar to the results obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasound Treatment On Visual Colormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…L*, a*and b* values gradually increased with treatment time increase. Tiwari et al (2008) studied the visual color of sonicated orange juice and found that the color values changed with treatment time increase. In particular, a sharp increase of the b* value was reported when orange juice was treated with ultrasound for 10 min, which is similar to the results obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasound Treatment On Visual Colormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies about effect of sonication on apple juice (Abid et al, 2013), kasturi lime juice (Bhat et al, 2011), cantaloupe melon juice (Fonteles et al, 2012) and orange juice (Tiwari et al, 2008), ultrasound treatment technology has been proved to a desirable method of juice processing, which can avoid losses in beneficial nutrients and reduce the microbial load in the fruit juices. It is considered to be more advantageous due to its shortened processing time with lower energy consumption (Abid et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in C * and h * was however, significant between fresh and control samples, as would be expected. Differences in perceivable colour can be analytically classified as very distinct (TCD > 3), distinct (1.5 < TCD < 3) and small difference (TCD < 1.5) (30). The TCD between fresh (Day 0) and control, T1, T2, T3, T4 tomatoes were 2.88, 2.81, 3.14, 3.30, and 2.45 respectively.…”
Section: Changes In Colourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is significant technique to determine interaction between responses (dependent variable) and factors (independent variable) and also to reduce number of experimental trials as compared to complete experimental design (Murphy et al 2004;Tiwari et al 2008 andGhodke et al 2009). It has been used for the simultaneous analysis of the effects of process parameters in fresh meat processing (Jakobsen and Bertelsen 2000) and also in some meat products (Desmond et al 1998;Yu 1999 andChung 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%