2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color, organic matter and sulfate removal from textile effluents by anaerobic and aerobic processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
40
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, at 6-h HRT, the removal efficiency decreased significantly to 24 % (547 mg/L in effluent). This lower COD removal efficiency also observed in others (Oh et al 2004;Amaral et al 2014) and can be associated with the presence of hardly biodegradable compounds as well as the possible toxic effects of dyestuffs and sodium chloride in real dyeing wastewater on the microbial activity. Wang et al (2008) showed the degradation of some complicated pollutants present in printing and dyeing wastewaters was better using the UASB reactor (COD removal, 35 %) compared to the anaerobic acidogenic unit (COD removal, 4 %), at the same HRT (15 h).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison, at 6-h HRT, the removal efficiency decreased significantly to 24 % (547 mg/L in effluent). This lower COD removal efficiency also observed in others (Oh et al 2004;Amaral et al 2014) and can be associated with the presence of hardly biodegradable compounds as well as the possible toxic effects of dyestuffs and sodium chloride in real dyeing wastewater on the microbial activity. Wang et al (2008) showed the degradation of some complicated pollutants present in printing and dyeing wastewaters was better using the UASB reactor (COD removal, 35 %) compared to the anaerobic acidogenic unit (COD removal, 4 %), at the same HRT (15 h).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Zou (2015) recently developed a hybrid method combining ozonation, activated carbon, and biological aerated filter (BAF) for the advanced treatment of dyeing wastewater for reuse, despite the high cost for ozonation. In comparison, the biological approaches to treat dyeing wastewater were reported successful by employing anaerobic/aerobic (Brown and Hamburger 1987;Shaw et al 2002;Amaral et al 2014), facultative anaerobic (Li and Xi 2004), and anaerobic (Senthilkumar et al 2011) processes to remove aromatic amines formed from the azo-bond dyestuff. The aerobic sludge granules highly concentrated with microorganisms (Kolekar et al 2012), the redox mediator (Rios-Del Toro et al 2013), and the PVA immobilization media (Chen et al 2003) had been applied for the removal of color from dyeing wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that approximately 15% of the dyestuffs are lost in industrial effluents during manufacturing processes (Ghodbane and Hamdaoui 2009). Such estimation indicates that 100 L of wastewater are produced for every kilogram of textile product, which is equivalent to 3.7 million liters each day worldwide (Amaral et al 2014). The release of this colored effluent into environment affects the aesthetic properties of aquatic environments, interferes with the growth of bacteria, and causes chronic health effects to living organisms due to their toxicity and mutagenicity (Gunukula and Tittlebaum 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, textile effluent contains high levels of sulfates and high salinity, which inhibit biological treatment. Indeed, Amaral et al (2014) attributed the poor performance of a system composed of a bioreactor followed by a SAB reactor, for color and organic matter removal, was due to the combination of both factors. The nature of the species present (Cl − , for example) in the effluent is extremely important as it may be transformed into other species that may increase (or decrease) the rate/efficiency of the overall treatment process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%