2014
DOI: 10.1080/19407963.2014.895286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

College football game day stadium incidents: policy and environmental effects on alcohol-related ejections and crime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studying the impact of alcohol sales adoption, Barry et al (2019) find that criminal incidents increased for an FBS school (identity of school not disclosed) in the two years after alcohol sales were instituted, relative to the level of incidents in the three years preceding the policy change. Similarly, using an expanded sample of seven FBS schools, some of which sell alcohol on game days, Menaker and Chaney (2014) find some evidence that alcohol sales are positively correlated with alcohol-related arrests, although the strongest positive correlation is found for attendance and crime. 10 In a working paper, Blemings (2020) studies the impact of alcohol sales policy changes for eight FBS schools, with a total panel of 44 schools over the 2008 to 2015 period.…”
Section: Alcohol Sales At College Football Games and Crimementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studying the impact of alcohol sales adoption, Barry et al (2019) find that criminal incidents increased for an FBS school (identity of school not disclosed) in the two years after alcohol sales were instituted, relative to the level of incidents in the three years preceding the policy change. Similarly, using an expanded sample of seven FBS schools, some of which sell alcohol on game days, Menaker and Chaney (2014) find some evidence that alcohol sales are positively correlated with alcohol-related arrests, although the strongest positive correlation is found for attendance and crime. 10 In a working paper, Blemings (2020) studies the impact of alcohol sales policy changes for eight FBS schools, with a total panel of 44 schools over the 2008 to 2015 period.…”
Section: Alcohol Sales At College Football Games and Crimementioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it is theoretically ambiguous whether game day alcohol sales contribute to increased alcohol consumption and intoxication. Until very recently, little was known empirically about the crime-related consequences of stadium alcohol policies, apart from a handful of case studies (Barry et al, 2019; Bormann & Stone, 2001; Boyes & Faith, 1993; Menaker & Chaney, 2014). In a working paper, Blemings (2020) finds that the introduction of alcohol sales at FBS college football games is associated with reductions in crime for 21-to-23 year-olds (compared to 18-to-20 year-olds) on home game days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This included arrests for possession of alcohol by a minor, driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), open alcohol container violations, possession of alcohol at the stadium, non-violent resisting of arrest, and battery. Menaker and Chaney (2014) sought to evaluate not simply the drinking behavior of fans at college football games, but also to measure the impact of different policies and environmental characteristics on that International Journal of Sport Management, Recreation & Tourism 52 behavior. The sample included seven stadiums located in the same state.…”
Section: Alcohol Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol-related ejections were influenced by the law enforcement policy on reporting ejections, temperature, attendance, and conference and rivalry games. According to Menaker and Chaney (2014) more of an effort should be made to educate and inform patrons of the alcohol policies, as well as scheduling earlier game times. In the event of later game times, tailgating restrictions were stressed as a method to reduce alcohol abuse before the game.…”
Section: Alcohol Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation