1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.71.3198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective transport in arrays of small metallic dots

Abstract: Collective charge transport is studied in one-and two-dimensional arrays of small normal-metal dots separated by tunnel barriers. At temperatures well below the charging energy of a dot, disorder leads to a threshold for conduction which grows linearly with the size of the array. For short-ranged interactions, one of the correlation length exponents near threshold is found from a novel argument based on interface growth. The dynamical exponent for the current above threshold is also predicted analytically, and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

36
516
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(555 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
36
516
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the fits, we obtain α = 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4 at 4.2 K, 10 K, and 15 K respectively. For a twodimensional array of nanoparticles, the theoretical value of α was predicted as 1.6 while numerical simulations yielded as 2.0 [29]. However, in previous experimental studies of two dimensional metal nanocrystal arrays, the exponent α was reported to vary from 2 to 2.5 which depends on size distribution, while for quasi 2D system with multilayered nanoparticles the value was 2.6 to 3.0 [30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Theoretical Studies Of Qd Arrays By Middleton and Wingreen (mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the fits, we obtain α = 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4 at 4.2 K, 10 K, and 15 K respectively. For a twodimensional array of nanoparticles, the theoretical value of α was predicted as 1.6 while numerical simulations yielded as 2.0 [29]. However, in previous experimental studies of two dimensional metal nanocrystal arrays, the exponent α was reported to vary from 2 to 2.5 which depends on size distribution, while for quasi 2D system with multilayered nanoparticles the value was 2.6 to 3.0 [30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Theoretical Studies Of Qd Arrays By Middleton and Wingreen (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E c is charging energy of a QD, β is a prefactor whose value depends on the dimensionality and arrays geometry (for a 2D array β = 0.3), and N is the number 7 of QDs in the conduction path [29,37]. From here, we can estimate the number of GQDs in our array contributing in the charge transport, however, we need to estimate E c first.…”
Section: Theoretical Studies Of Qd Arrays By Middleton and Wingreen (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on electronic properties of porous materials includes theoretical work on quantum percolation, [8][9][10] which applies when porosity has an atomic length scale, and studies of Coulomb-blockaded semiclassical transport on porous lattices that reveals analogies with phase transitions. [11][12][13] In the present paper, we study the diffusion of photogenerated electrons in mesoporous titania. The electrolyte, which fills the pores, is not only essential to the application of this material in solar cells, but also appears to passivate defects that greatly retard electron transport in "dry" mesoporous titania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of both charge and structural disorder this interplay leads to highly nonOhmic current-voltage (I-V) characteristics. Coulomb blockade theory predicts that at low temperatures, there is no current below a specific threshold voltage, V t , while above V t the current follows a power law:with ζ ~ 1 in one dimensional (1D) and 5/3 or 2 in twodimensional (2D) systems [2]. V t depends on the nanocrystal number, the capacitance of the conducting regions and the capacitance between the each region and the back gate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with ζ ~ 1 in one dimensional (1D) and 5/3 or 2 in twodimensional (2D) systems [2]. V t depends on the nanocrystal number, the capacitance of the conducting regions and the capacitance between the each region and the back gate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%