2013
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production

Abstract: This article addresses the sustainability of citizen/user participation in the provision of public services, often referred to as co-production. Co-producing public services not only promises to limit cost, but it also requires a change in the relations and behaviour of public servants and citizens/users, in order for the latter to make a long-term commitment to coproduction. The article notes that Olsen proposes two logics of collective action, not just one. Focusing on small group interaction can provide an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
135
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
135
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Strangers are less likely to trust each other because they have no information about each other's intentions. When there are doubts whether other users are motivated to co-produce, and when there is indeed a chance that people deflect from their duty to provide efforts in the service delivery, the collective coproduction process is negatively affected (Pestoff, 2014). The perception that others might contribute fewer efforts in the co-production than you are contributing increases feelings of outcome uncertainty.…”
Section: Co-production: An Alternative Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strangers are less likely to trust each other because they have no information about each other's intentions. When there are doubts whether other users are motivated to co-produce, and when there is indeed a chance that people deflect from their duty to provide efforts in the service delivery, the collective coproduction process is negatively affected (Pestoff, 2014). The perception that others might contribute fewer efforts in the co-production than you are contributing increases feelings of outcome uncertainty.…”
Section: Co-production: An Alternative Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the effects of collective co-production, theories on collective action will be used in addition to psychological theories. For this, this study mostly builds on work from Ostrom (2000;Pestoff, 2014) and Tilly (2005b). These theories will also provide insights to possible unfavourable conditions for creating trust, such as extrinsic motivation and free-riding behaviour.…”
Section: Theoretical Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bovaird, Van Ryzin, Loeffler et al (2015) call these intermediate degrees of co-production as "hybrids". Pestoff (2014) suggests that future research should seek to understand how individual and collective co-production levels blend and relate.…”
Section: Co-production Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are critiques of this economic aspect of co-production, where the government will often see it co-production only as a possibility of reducing costs (CEPIKU and GIORDANO, 2014;PESTOFF, 2014; BOVAIRD, VAN RYZIN, LOEFFLER et al, 2015). However, Lam (1996) argues that the feasibility of providing services only by government agencies has been seriously challenged.…”
Section: Technical Capacity and Economic Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the relationship between state and citizens is undergoing a profound process of change in post-modern societies [35], and Arnstein's hierarchical conception of participation fails to capture the full complexity of this transformation; this is probably the major source of criticism [21,22,29,31]. The mere focus on the allocation of power might even lead to an adversarial picture of participation, as "contest between two parties" [22], a "power struggle between citizens to move up the ladder" and the government [21], and "based on the idea of a conflict between the powerful and the powerless" [15].…”
Section: A Review On Public Participation-the Cracks In the Laddermentioning
confidence: 99%