Cold Recycled Asphalt Mixture using 100% RAP with Emulsified Asphalt-Recycling Agent as a New Pavement Base Course

Abstract

The rehabilitation process of asphalt pavements using the technique of milling and filling can cause several environmental problems due to either the disposal of the milled asphalt mix or the exploration of natural resources. One alternative to mitigate these impacts is to reuse this milled material, known as reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), in the construction of new pavement layers. Within the several available techniques to reuse the RAP, cold recycling using an emulsified asphalt-recycling agent has shown great potential. The aim of this study is to evaluate the application of a cold recycled asphalt mix using 100% RAP with an emulsified asphalt-recycling agent as a new pavement base course. A trial section was built employing this material as a pavement base course in a heavy traffic highway in Brazil, and its structural behavior was monitored for 12 months using a Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) to assess its performance over time. Furthermore, a laboratory-testing program was performed to evaluate the recycled mixture stiffness and strength through resilient modulus and indirect tensile strength tests. These tests were used to investigate the influence of the storage interval (7, 14, and 28 days) considering the time between mixing and compaction of the mixture. The effect of the curing time after compaction (1, 3, 7, 26, and 56 days) was also assessed. It was verified in laboratory and in the trial section that the stiffness increases with curing time. Furthermore, the backcalculated elastic resilient moduli indicated values in the same order of magnitude to those obtained in the laboratory tests. In addition to the laboratory test findings, it was also observed that the longer the period of storage, the higher the values of stiffness and tensile strength for short periods of curing. This behavior was not verified when longer curing periods were used. In general, the use of cold recycled asphalt mixtures as base course of new pavements proved to be a promising alternative to reuse RAP.

Recycled Asphalt Pavement Materials in Transport Pavement Infrastructure: Sustainability Analysis & Metrics

“…Several studies indicated that the use of RAP in HMA can match or enhance mixture properties and performance in relation to conventional materials when appropriate rejuvenators and gradation adjustments are used [3][4][5]. Similarly, the use of RAP in the base or subbase can meet or slightly exceed the mechanical properties and performance in relation to the granular aggregate base, GAB, [1,2,27]. Thus, in this analysis, the same performance was assumed for surface and base/subbase materials incorporating RAP in relation to conventional materials.…”

“…Thus, 20% and 50% of RAP in HMA were selected to reflect the currently common practice and maximum levels identified by many states. Past studies also examined the feasibility of using 100% RAP as a new pavement course, and thus, the percentage of RAP in GAB and ATB ranges 0-100 in the case studies [27] Specifically, the RAP in HMA ranged from 0 to 50%, in ATB from 0 to 100%, and in GAB from 0 to 100%. Figure 5 provides the alternative sustainable rehabilitation strategies for the threelayer roadway case.…”

Modification Mechanism and Rheological Properties of Emulsified Asphalt Evaporative Residues Reinforced by Coupling-Modified Fiber

“…The performance of emulsified asphalt evaporation residue affects the performance of emulsified asphalt cold recycled mixture. In order to further improve the application level and road performance of the emulsified asphalt cold recycled mixture, it is necessary to improve the comprehensive performance of the emulsified asphalt evaporation residue [ 6 ].…”

Study on the Parameter Optimization and Strength Mechanism of Coal Gangue Emulsified Asphalt Mixture

“…Emulsified asphalt mixture has the characteristics of "simple and flexible construction, ultrathin and durable performance, and open and fast traffic" [2]. However, this environmentally friendly material also has some disadvantages, such as poor early strength and demulsification, which have seriously restricted the popularization and use of this material [3]. At the same time, the coal industry in China emits about 280 million tons of coal gangue every year.…”