2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohen–Macaulayness of powers of two-dimensional squarefree monomial ideals

Abstract: Two-dimensional squarefree monomial ideals can be seen as the Stanley-Reisner ideals of graphs. The main results of this paper are combinatorial characterizations for the Cohen-Macaulayness of ordinary and symbolic powers of such an ideal in terms of the associated graph.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall see that there are complexes for which I 2 is Cohen-Macaulay but I m is not Cohen-Macaulay for all m 3 and that if I m is Cohen-Macaulay for some m 3, then I is a complete intersection. These results resemble the results for one-dimensional complexes [12] and for flag complexes [16]. So it is quite natural to ask the following question.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We shall see that there are complexes for which I 2 is Cohen-Macaulay but I m is not Cohen-Macaulay for all m 3 and that if I m is Cohen-Macaulay for some m 3, then I is a complete intersection. These results resemble the results for one-dimensional complexes [12] and for flag complexes [16]. So it is quite natural to ask the following question.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The above problems were first studied for one-dimensional complexes in [12], where one can find combinatorial characterizations for the Cohen-Macaulayness of I (m) and a complete description of all complexes with I (m) = I m in terms of the associated graph. There is a remarkable distinction between the case m = 2 and m 3 in the sense that there are complexes for which I (2) is Cohen-Macaulay but also found in [16] for the case where is a flag complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency of this formula was shown in recent papers (see [7], [12], [17], [18], [19]). Using this formula and an explicit description of it for symbolic powers of StanleyReisner ideals given in [17], we are able to study the stability of depths of powers of edge ideals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In [17,Lemma 1.3] there was given an useful formula for computing ∆ α (I (n) ∆ ). We apply it to edge ideals.…”
Section: Lemma 12 ([22]) a Graph G Is Bipartite If And Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%