2006
DOI: 10.1159/000090680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cochlear Electrode Arrays: Past, Present and Future

Abstract: Cochlear implants are very successful devices: more than 60000 people use them throughout the world. Key to the success of these prostheses is the development of electrode arrays that place contacts close to the target neurons, survive for decades in the tissues of the inner ear, and that provide reliable and repeatable excitation to the cells of the auditory nerve. This article describes the early electrode arrays and their development into the arrays that are used presently in clinical cochlear prostheses. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a large gain in the number of independent sites may well require a fundamentally new type of electrode, or a fundamentally different placement of electrodes, or a fundamentally different type or mode of stimulation. The many issues related to electrode design, along with prospects for the future, are discussed in , Spelman (2006), Middlebrooks and Snyder (2007 and this issue), Anderson (this issue), and Wise et al (this issue). Additionally, a new approach using optical rather than electrical stimulation of auditory neurons is described by Richter et al in this issue.…”
Section: Electrical Stimulation Of the Auditory Nervementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a large gain in the number of independent sites may well require a fundamentally new type of electrode, or a fundamentally different placement of electrodes, or a fundamentally different type or mode of stimulation. The many issues related to electrode design, along with prospects for the future, are discussed in , Spelman (2006), Middlebrooks and Snyder (2007 and this issue), Anderson (this issue), and Wise et al (this issue). Additionally, a new approach using optical rather than electrical stimulation of auditory neurons is described by Richter et al in this issue.…”
Section: Electrical Stimulation Of the Auditory Nervementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such growth would bring the target to the electrodes. Another possibility is to implant an array of electrodes directly within the auditory nerve (an intramodiolar implant), through an opening made in the basal part of the cochlea (Arts et al, 2003;Badi et al, 2003Badi et al, , 2007Hillman et al, 2003;Spelman, 2006;Middlebrooks and Snyder, 2007 and this issue; Anderson, this issue). In this case, the electrodes would be placed immediately adjacent to axons of the auditory nerve.…”
Section: Likely Limitations Imposed By Present Electrode Designs and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a large gain in the number of independent sites may well require a fundamentally new type of electrode or a fundamentally different placement of electrodes. The many issues related to electrode design, along with prospects for the future, are discussed elsewhere [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Figure 2 shows a complete presence of hair cells (in the labeled organ of Corti) and a pristine survival of cochlear neurons.…”
Section: Direct Electrical Stimulation Of Cochlear Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such growth of neurites would bring the target to the electrodes. Another possibility is to implant an array of electrodes directly within the auditory nerve (an intramodiolar implant) through an opening made in the basal part of the cochlea [19][20][21][23][24][25]. In this case, the electrodes would be placed immediately adjacent to axons of the auditory nerve.…”
Section: Likely Limitations Imposed By Present-day Electrode Designs mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implantable electrode technology is a clinically effective treatment for a number of disorders including deafness [1] and for symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease [2]. In addition, increasing evidence suggests that such technology may be applicable in brain-machine interface (BMI) applications to control limb prostheses [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%