2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of microglial attachment and cytokine release on biomaterials of differing surface chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
80
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
7
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The supernatant enriched with microglia was collected and centrifuged (200g, 5 min). Microglial cell culture purity was quantified after immunolabelling using CD11b antibody (1 : 200; Abcam, Belgium) and found to be above 90% (see details in the electronic supplementary material) in accordance with previous reports that used a similar isolation technique [18,28]. A total of 6 Â 10 4 viable cells ml 21 were seeded on P(TMC-CL) substrates secured at the bottom of a 24-well plate with a silicone o-ring (Epidor, Spain) and cultured in DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S for 1 or 5 days.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The supernatant enriched with microglia was collected and centrifuged (200g, 5 min). Microglial cell culture purity was quantified after immunolabelling using CD11b antibody (1 : 200; Abcam, Belgium) and found to be above 90% (see details in the electronic supplementary material) in accordance with previous reports that used a similar isolation technique [18,28]. A total of 6 Â 10 4 viable cells ml 21 were seeded on P(TMC-CL) substrates secured at the bottom of a 24-well plate with a silicone o-ring (Epidor, Spain) and cultured in DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S for 1 or 5 days.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The chemistry of the surface was found to influence the cytokine release profile of microglia depending on its hydrophobicity [18]. In what concerns surface topography, the effect of nanostructured silicone or poly(dimethylsiloxane) surfaces on microglia morphology, adhesion [19,20] or motility [19] was also investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the functionality is limited to short periods (weeks to months) and continued signal deterioration. Causes of such electrode failure include poor bio-abio interface, tissue damage by probe micromotion within the soft nerve tissue, and electrode insulation as a result of tissue scar formation [6,7]. These limitations require neurointerface recalibration prior to each recording session and the gradual increase of the amount of electrical stimulation needed to maintain neural responses over time, which in turn raises the risk of electrolytic tissue damage and further compromises the long-term stability of the neurointerface.…”
Section: Issues In Neurointerfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological analyses following cortical implant insertion have shown encapsulation of the implant by activated microglia and astrocytes in a process known as glial scarring [3]. Evidence suggests that microglia mediate this response by becoming activated upon contact with many of the materials used in current implanted electrodes [8]. Improving neuron-electrode connectivity by reducing microglial activation and the subsequent scarring around neural implants has therefore become an important area of BCI research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These materials are known for their ability to resist protein adsorption and microglial attachment, factors thought to be important in initiating the foreign body response [8,[35][36][37][38]. PEGylated, micro-patterned DLC substrates are used to spatially control the adhesion of inflammatory cells (principally myeloid cells such as macrophages and CNS microglia).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%