No abstract

Background:For years, the safety and effectiveness of autologous fat grafting (AFG) for breast reconstruction have been in question, with particular concern over fat necrosis, calcifications, cyst formation, and interfering with the detection of breast cancer. However, increasing evidence suggests that the complication rates and clinical results are generally acceptable to both clinicians and patients. The emerging challenge is the numerous AFG techniques and systems, where there are limited knowledge and data. The objective of this study was to conduct a literature review that focuses on the safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of various AFG techniques as applied to the breast.Methods:A PubMed search using terms related to AFG was performed over a 5-year period (April 1, 2010–April 30, 2015). Original articles focused on AFG to the breast, with outcomes on safety, effectiveness, and efficiency, were included.Results:Five hundred ninety-eight articles were identified with 36 articles included (n = 4306 patients). Satisfaction rates were high although the prevalence of complications was low—similar to previous findings. Seven studies reported average operating room time with an overall mean of 125 minutes (range: 40–210). The mean volume of fat harvested was 558 mL (range: 120–1299), and fat injected was 145 mL (range: 20–607). A positive association between injection volume and operating time was observed.Conclusions:This review validates previous findings on the safety and effectiveness of AFG to the breast and highlights its efficiency. The efficiency data available, although limited, suggest that there is an opportunity to achieve time and cost savings while not sacrificing safety and effectiveness.

Background Biofilm-associated bacteria have been observed in both breast implant revision and tissue expander-implant exchange surgeries. The utilization of antimicrobial solutions in breast surgery, especially those containing triple antibiotics (TAB) and/or 10% povidone-iodine (PI), may help reduce existing biofilm-associated bacteria, which is particularly important in a mature breast pocket that may contain residual bacteria from a previously colonized implant surface or, theoretically, bacteria that may arrive postoperatively through hematogenous spread. Objectives A series of in vitro assessments was performed to evaluate the antimicrobial utility of TAB and PI, either alone or in combination, against preformed biofilm-associated bacteria. Methods Preformed biofilm-associated gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains were exposed to TAB and PI ± TAB for up to 30 minutes in a bacterial time-kill assay. Efficacy of various dilutions of PI and the effects of serum protein on PI efficacy were also investigated. Results TAB was ineffective at the timeframes tested when utilized alone; when utilized in conjunction with PI, significant log reduction of all biofilm-associated bacterial species tested was achieved when treated for at least 5 minutes. PI alone at a concentration of 25% or higher was also effective, although its efficacy was negatively affected by increasing serum protein concentration only for Staphylococcus epidermidis. Conclusions Our data indicate that PI-containing solutions significantly reduce biofilm-associated bacteria, suggesting potential utility for breast pocket irrigation during revision or exchange surgeries. Care should be taken to minimize excessive dilution of PI to maintain efficacy.

Background Planktonic bacteria can be inadvertently introduced during breast surgery procedures, which are hypothesized to lead to complications such as infection, capsular contracture, BIA-ALCL, and a prolonged local inflammatory response. The use of antimicrobial solutions such as triple antibiotic solution (TAB) and/or 10% povidone-iodine (PI), in breast pocket irrigation or implant soaking have been proposed to reduce planktonic bacterial attachment and potential complications. Objectives A series of in vitro assessments were performed to evaluate the antimicrobial utility of triple antibiotic solution (TAB) and PI, either alone or in combination, against planktonic bacteria. Methods Planktonic gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains were exposed to TAB and PI +/- TAB for up to 10 minutes in a bacterial time-kill assay. Efficacy of various dilutions of PI as well as the effects of serum protein on PI efficacy were also investigated. Results TAB was ineffective at the timeframes tested (≤ 10 minutes) when used alone; however, when used with PI, significant log reduction of all tested planktonic species was achieved. PI alone was also effective, even including dilute concentrations (e.g., 0.5% PI), although the presence of serum proteins required higher concentrations of PI (e.g., 2.5%) to eradicate the bacterial load. Conclusions Our data suggest PI-containing solutions may be preferred over either saline or TAB without PI for primary breast pocket irrigation and implant soaking in primary breast surgeries as a means to significantly reduce planktonic bacteria. These data provide an impetus for surgeons to re-evaluate the efficacy of TAB solution in these clinical settings.

Background: Microbial pathogens local to prosthetic breast devices may promote infection, inflammation, and capsular contracture. Although antimicrobial solutions have been used, their effects on human acellular dermal matrix (HADM) incorporation when used with prosthetic devices are unknown. The authors' objective was to histologically assess the effect of 10% povidone iodine (PI)-saturated tissue expander (TE) exposure on HADM biological response in a primate model. They hypothesized that PI exposure would not negatively affect the HADM biological response. Methods: Samples (1.5 × 1.5 cm) from smooth silicone TEs were saturated in saline or PI for 2 minutes and sutured to HADM to create HADM/TE constructs. Primates implanted subcutaneously with saline (n = 9) and PI-treated HADM/ TE (n = 9) construct pairs were evaluated histologically for biological response after 2 or 4 weeks by means of a host response scoring scale (1 to 9), including recellularization, neovascularization, and inflammation. Inflammatory cells (eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophils, histiocytes, foreign-body giant cells) and evidence of HADM remodeling (fibroblasts, vessels) were further evaluated by means of a cell-specific scoring scale (0 to 4) and corroborated by immunostaining (CD3, CD20, CD68, FSP-1, collagen type IV). Results: Mean histology scores were similar between saline-and PI-exposed HADM at 2 weeks (5.3 ± 0.9 and 5.6 ± 0.5; P = 0.52) and 4 weeks (4.6 ± 1.0 and 4.2 ± 0.9; P = 0.44). There was no difference in inflammatory cell presence at 2 and 4 weeks between groups. Fibroblast infiltration differences were insignificant between groups but exhibited trends toward an increase between time points for saline (1.6 ± 0.7 to 1.8 ± 0.8) and PI (1.3 ± 0.8 to 1.8 ± 1.0) groups, suggesting HADM incorporation over time. Conclusion: Data suggest that HADM exposure to PI-treated TEs does not negatively affect inflammation, vascularization, recellularization, incorporation, or host response to HADM in this model.