1991
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.48854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cocaine and food deprivation : effects on food-reinforced fixed-ratio performance in pigeons /

Abstract: Key pecking by 6 pigeons was maintained by a fixed-ratio 30 schedule of food presentation while body weights were 80% of free-feeding weights. Acute administration of cocaine (0.3 to 13.0 mg/ kg, i.m.) dose-dependently decreased response rates. Dose-effect curves were shifted to the right when 3 of the 6 pigeons were maintained at 70% of free-feeding weights and were shifted to the left when the other 3 pigeons were maintained at 90% of free-feeding weights. Then a dose of cocaine that initially decreased resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the ''strength'' of baseline responding, as indexed by the initial disruption by the drug, could be a predictor of tolerance development (cf., Hoffman et al, 1987). In another experiment, pigeons were maintained at different levels of food deprivation (Hughes, Pitts, & Branch, 1996). The ratedecreasing effects of cocaine were attenuated and exacerbated when pigeons were maintained at a lower level or higher level of food deprivation, respectively.…”
Section: Pigeon 9469mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the ''strength'' of baseline responding, as indexed by the initial disruption by the drug, could be a predictor of tolerance development (cf., Hoffman et al, 1987). In another experiment, pigeons were maintained at different levels of food deprivation (Hughes, Pitts, & Branch, 1996). The ratedecreasing effects of cocaine were attenuated and exacerbated when pigeons were maintained at a lower level or higher level of food deprivation, respectively.…”
Section: Pigeon 9469mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of drugs on behavior are altered in several ways by level of food deprivation. The rate-decreasing effects of higher doses of psychomotor stimulants are lessened with increasing deprivation (Cole, 1967;Gollub & Mann, 1969;Hughes, Pitts, & Branch, 1996;Samson, 1986;Schaal & Branch, 1992;Schaal, Miller, & Odum, 1995). Increased food deprivation also has been shown to enhance the rate-increasing effects of low doses of cocaine (Schaal et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreased ability of large doses of psychomotor stimulants such as d-amphetamine and cocaine to suppress rates of food-maintained behavior when subjects are more severely deprived is well documented (e.g., Cole, 1967;Gollub & Mann, 1969;Hughes et al, 1996;Samson, 1986;Schaal & Branch, 1992;Schaal et al, 1995). However, the effects of opioids on operant behavior under different levels of deprivation have received little investigation (but see Kelly & Thompson, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a regimen might promote tolerance by allowing subjects to "recover" from large-dose effects by having less effective doses follow. It should also be noted that, in their study, each series of doses included one exposure to the drug vehicle, and there are data to suggest that occasional sessions with vehicle present may promote tolerance to the behavioral effects of cocaine (Hughes et al 1996). These possibilities, as well as the advisability of examining the generality of effects of variable dosing, indicate that examination of dose order in variable dosing is warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%