1998
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food‐deprivation Level Alters the Effects of Morphine on Pigeons' Key Pecking

Abstract: Four pigeons pecked response keys under a multiple fixed-ratio 30 fixed-interval 5-min schedule of food presentation. Components alternated separated by 15-s timeouts; each was presented six times. Pigeons were maintained at 70%, 85%, and greater than 90% of their free-feeding weights across experimental conditions. When response rates were stable, the effects of morphine (0.56 to 10.0 mg/kg) and saline were investigated. Morphine reduced response rates in a dose-dependent manner under the fixed-ratio schedule… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between sucrose and saccharin may be due to the postingestive nutritive action of sucrose [16,50], suggesting that caloric sucrose has a strong propensity to reinforce uncontrolled eating such as binge-like overconsumption under food restriction conditions. Food deprivation affects not only food consumption, but also enhances addictive behavior for drugs of abuse [59,60] and the rewarding effects of food [53,61]. How food restriction can drive neuronal changes underlying binge-like behaviors remains to be identified, although some clues are emerging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between sucrose and saccharin may be due to the postingestive nutritive action of sucrose [16,50], suggesting that caloric sucrose has a strong propensity to reinforce uncontrolled eating such as binge-like overconsumption under food restriction conditions. Food deprivation affects not only food consumption, but also enhances addictive behavior for drugs of abuse [59,60] and the rewarding effects of food [53,61]. How food restriction can drive neuronal changes underlying binge-like behaviors remains to be identified, although some clues are emerging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects were 4 adult male White Carneau pigeons with previous acute exposure to cocaine (Schaal, Miller, & Odum, 1995) and morphine (Odum, Haworth, & Schaal, 1998;Odum & Schaal, 1999) while responding under a multiple fixed-ratio FI schedule or a multiple FI clocked FI schedule of food presentation. The pigeons were maintained at 80% (Ϯ 10 g) of their free-feeding weights through postsession feedings of mixed grain as necessary.…”
Section: Experiments 1 Methods Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak procedure was selected because of its similarity to the FI schedule. We reasoned that any drug that alters FI schedule performance in a rate-dependent fashion, including morphine (Heifetz & McMillan, 1971;Katz & Goldberg, 1986;McKearney, 1974;Odum, Haworth, & Schaal, 1998;Odum & Schaal, 1999Rhodus, Elsmore, & Manning, 1974), should also alter performance on the PI trials, at least in the early portion of these trials. The two-key task, on the other hand, is seemingly not similar to the FI schedule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%