Co-Production in Healthcare

McMullin, Caitlin; Needham, Catherine

doi:10.4324/9781315204956-22

Cited by 30 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Empirical evidence has been assessed in several countries, proving the adaptability and compatibility of these concepts within different contexts [ 3 ]. A strong geographical concentration is still detectable: 73% of health studies and 62% of public sector studies refer to five countries.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Field : Both the health and public sector co-production literature were investigated. The second stream has been considered well-developed [ 3 ], and recent reviews on co-production in public show that health services emerge as one of the main sectors of interest [ 29 ]. Moreover, co-production outcome evaluation in public services (with a particular emphasis on health) has recently gained the main attention of distinguished scholars in the field [ 15 , 36 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Co-production is widely considered a promising tool for dealing with current challenges in the health sector [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], where resources are being significantly reduced. Conversely, patients’ expectations of higher-quality services are growing amid increasing demand caused by an aging population and the rise in chronic diseases.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics

Marsilio

Fusco

Gheduzzi

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Co-produced practices and publications in the healthcare sector are gaining momentum, since they can be a useful tool in addressing the sustainability and resilience challenges of health systems. However, the investigation of positive and, mainly, negative outcomes is still confused and fragmented, and above all, a comprehensive knowledge of the metrics used to assess these outcomes is lacking. To fill this gap, this study aims to systematically review the extant literature to map the methods, tools and metrics used to empirically evaluate co-production in health services. The search took place in six databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Psych INFO, PubMed, Cochrane and CINAHL. A total of 2311 articles were screened and 203 articles were included in the analysis, according to PRISMA guidelines. Findings show that outcomes are mainly investigated through qualitative methods and from the lay actor or provider perspective. Moreover, the detailed categorisation of the quantitative measures found offers a multidimensional performance measurement system and highlights the impact areas where research is needed to develop and test new measures. Findings should also promote improvements in empirical data collection on the multiple faceted co-produced activities and spur the consciousness of the adoption of sustainable co-productive initiatives.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics

Marsilio

Fusco

Gheduzzi

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Teachers know best how to educate children generally, parents know their own children best (Honingh, Bondarouk, and Brandsen 2018). This is the element that past research has demonstrated most successfully, for example, how different parties contribute to the regeneration of their neighbourhoods (Vanleene, Voets, and Verschuere 2017) or how patients bring expertise to their treatment (Batalden, Batalden, and Margolis et al 2016;McMullin and Needham 2018).…”

Section: Deconstructing the Interactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation

Lember

Brandsen

Tõnurist

2019

Public Management Review

190

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite growing interest in the potential of digital technologies to enhance coproduction and co-creation in public services, there is a lack of hard evidence on their actual impact. Conceptual fuzziness and tech-optimism stand in the way of collecting such evidence. The article suggests an analytical framework that distinguishes between the impacts of different technologies on different elements of coproduction and co-creation, and illustrates this in three different areas. It argues that there is no reason to assume that digital technologies will always encourage coproduction or co-creation. In fact, they can also be used to bypass interaction with citizens.

show abstract

“…Co-production is seen as a promising tool for dealing with challenges in the health sector [1][2][3]. The rates of chronic diseases are growing, as well as the expectations of patients regarding the quality of services [4].…”

Section: Introduction Background and Rationale Of The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evaluation of Determinants and Impacts of Co-Production in Healthcare: A Research Protocol for OPAT in Cystic Fibrosis

Marsilio

Gramegna

Fusco

et al. 2021

International Journal of Integrated Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Co-production is more and more considered as a promising tool for dealing with the main challenges in the health sector (e.g., growing rates of chronic diseases, budget constraints, higher patients' expectations of the quality and the value of services, equity to access of care, etc.). However, there is still little evidence on coproduction determinants and impacts.Description: This research protocol aims to present a framework to assess the determinants and impacts of the co-productive approach in healthcare delivery on patients, professionals, and providers from economic, organisational, and clinical perspectives. To this end, the paper examines the co-produced outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), applied to cystic fibrosis patients in an Italian hospital. A mixed methods approach will be adopted and data will be collected through semistructured interviews and surveys of patients, caregivers, and professionals; biological samples of patients; archival sources. Then, the analyses to be performed are the following: (i) cost evaluation, (ii) content, (iii) descriptive and inferential statistical, (iv) microbiome analysis, and (v) desk analysis. Conclusion:The research protocol contributes to both theoretical and practical knowledge. It represents the first attempt to develop a systematic analytical framework for the evaluation of co-production in healthcare. Moreover, the findings gathered within the study will provide evidence to support policy makers and managers in decision-making and managerial processes within the health service.

show abstract

Co-Production in Healthcare

Cited by 30 publications

References 0 publications

Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics

Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics

The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation

The Evaluation of Determinants and Impacts of Co-Production in Healthcare: A Research Protocol for OPAT in Cystic Fibrosis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About