1996
DOI: 10.1080/0013191960480105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co‐operation and Tension between Autonomous Schools: a study of inter‐school networking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This side of network life may play itself out in quite complex patterns. For example, Busher and Hodgkinson's (1996) work illustrates how complex webs of educational networks can emerge in education: secondary schools can form inter-school networks with similar institutions from the same schooling phase; simultaneously, each can form a network with its main feeder primary schools; moreover, some of the head teachers of these and other institutions can join together in a schoolleader network, while some of its staff can integrate still other professional networks, for example, ones linked to pedagogical or subject-centered renewal movements. Thus, networks of networks can emerge, often cross-cutting one another and forming interlocking structures.…”
Section: Network Ecologymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This side of network life may play itself out in quite complex patterns. For example, Busher and Hodgkinson's (1996) work illustrates how complex webs of educational networks can emerge in education: secondary schools can form inter-school networks with similar institutions from the same schooling phase; simultaneously, each can form a network with its main feeder primary schools; moreover, some of the head teachers of these and other institutions can join together in a schoolleader network, while some of its staff can integrate still other professional networks, for example, ones linked to pedagogical or subject-centered renewal movements. Thus, networks of networks can emerge, often cross-cutting one another and forming interlocking structures.…”
Section: Network Ecologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can lead school leaders into an ambivalent attitude toward networking: some value it, but are eager to resist common initiatives (e.g., the establishment of common records of achievement across schools) that they regard as infringements of their autonomy. To avoid the risk of serious collusion among participants, some inter-school networks adopt the principle of subsidiarity, according to which schools participating in a network may choose to ignore group discussions (Busher and Hodgkinson 1996). However, this solution itself can become a problem, because failing to adopt collective decisions may be a first step toward animosity from other partners and may ultimately lead to reciprocal, circular and mounting processes of relational disengagement.…”
Section: Disengagement and Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Verfahren N * Studien (Zuordnung siehe Literaturverzeichnis) interviews 35 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,12,14,15,16,19,24,25,26,30,32,35,37,38,39,41,42,43,44,46,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,57 Fragebögen 20 6,9,12,14,15,18,25,32,37,38,40,41,43,44,45,47,48,52,...…”
Section: Tab 2: Eingesetzte Verfahren Zur Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eine ähnliche Abstufung im Anspruch des methodischen Vorgehens lässt sich bei den erfahrungsberichten erkennen. neben eingereichten Berichten der lehrkräfte ohne methodische Vorgaben (rué 2005) steht hier auch der systematische einsatz der "Critical incidents Technique" (gettinger et al 1999 22 6,9,14,15,18,19,22,24,25,26,30,32,34,35,40,41,45,47,51,52,55,57 einmalige Datenerhebung 11 2,5,7,16,37,38,39,43,44,46,53 Beschreibung/exploration 22 3,4,8,10,11,12,13,17,20,23,27,28,29,31,…”
Section: Forschungsansätzeunclassified