1996
DOI: 10.2307/2261357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO 2 Fluxes from Peat in Boreal Mires under Varying Temperature and Moisture Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

28
294
7
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 413 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
28
294
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies documented that main factors impacting soil respiration (R ECO ) and therefore carbon emissions are air temperature (Bubier et al 1998;Bortoluzzi et al 2006;Davidson et al 2006;Heijmans et al 2013) or peat temperature (Chapman and Thurlow 1996;Silvola et al 1996;Lafleur et al 2005;Juszczak et al 2013;D'Angelo et al 2016). Approximate 1°C temperature increase at subarctic peatlands resulted in increases of R ECO values and mobilization of carbon that was located in deeper peat layers (Dorrepaal et al 2009).…”
Section: Additive Effect Of Warming and Lowering Of Wtd On C Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies documented that main factors impacting soil respiration (R ECO ) and therefore carbon emissions are air temperature (Bubier et al 1998;Bortoluzzi et al 2006;Davidson et al 2006;Heijmans et al 2013) or peat temperature (Chapman and Thurlow 1996;Silvola et al 1996;Lafleur et al 2005;Juszczak et al 2013;D'Angelo et al 2016). Approximate 1°C temperature increase at subarctic peatlands resulted in increases of R ECO values and mobilization of carbon that was located in deeper peat layers (Dorrepaal et al 2009).…”
Section: Additive Effect Of Warming and Lowering Of Wtd On C Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far many studies showed that clipping and removing the aboveground parts of plants decreased R ECO , because this reduces soil respiration by decreasing the input of labile carbon to soil (Wan and Luo 2003;Bahn et al 2006) and/or by weakening the assimilation supply from photosynthesis (Bahn et al 2008). It is widely known that the cutting causes slower regeneration of plants (Silvola et al 1996).…”
Section: Cutting Impact On R Ecomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N 2 O emissions from cultivated peat soils show a great variation in time and space and depend on a number of factors (Regina et al, 2004) such as drainage, peat type, climate and fertilisation. Initial lowering of the water table generally increases the N 2 O emission rate but the long-term influence of drainage depth is not as straightforward (Regina et al, 1996;Maljanen et al, 2003c;Klemedtsson et al, 2005) Many investigations of GHG emissions from peat soils have been conducted under uncontrolled conditions in the field (Nykänen et al, 1995;Freeman et al, 1996;Silvola et al, 1996;Flessa et al, 1998) or on disturbed soil samples (Freeman et al, 1996;Aerts and Ludwig, 1997;Best and Jacobs, 1997;Chapman and Thurlow, 1998) where the original structure of the peat profile and its characteristic hydrological features are lost. Information on the peat soil profile and the properties of the soils has in many cases been lacking or insufficient (Freeman et al, 1996;Koizumi et al, 1999;Regina et al, 2004), which makes interpretation of the results difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil nutrient gradient consists of peatland sites representing different site types that were drained at the same time. Based on earlier research on CO 2 fluxes from peatland sites with varying drainage status and nutrient levels, we hypothesized that i) mass loss rates of pine litter would progressively increase following drainage as the depth to water table increases (e.g., Silvola et al, 1996), and ii) mass loss rates of pine litter would follow the original (pre-drainage) soil nutrient gradient being greatest in the most nutrient-rich site (e.g., Martikainen et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%