2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2007
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2007.4422808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud-contaminated image reconstruction with contextual spatio-spectral information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main assumptions are that clouds and shadows can be identified and then replaced using data from other dates (Martinuzzi et al 2007). Indeed, prediction algorithms, based on spatial and spectral correlation (Benabdelkader et al 2007), may be implemented using data available in the cloud-free neighbourhood of contaminated areas (Benabdelkader and Melgani 2008). Visual comparison of multi-band images 'before' and 'after' removal of cloud and cloud shadows (figure 4), along with the accuracy assessment results, indicated that our cloud removal efforts associated with a multi-temporal spectral analysis approach provided a fairly accurate classification map for an area considered difficult to classify due to persistent cloud cover and challenges in spectrally discriminating among land cover types that have similar spectral characteristics during various times of the year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main assumptions are that clouds and shadows can be identified and then replaced using data from other dates (Martinuzzi et al 2007). Indeed, prediction algorithms, based on spatial and spectral correlation (Benabdelkader et al 2007), may be implemented using data available in the cloud-free neighbourhood of contaminated areas (Benabdelkader and Melgani 2008). Visual comparison of multi-band images 'before' and 'after' removal of cloud and cloud shadows (figure 4), along with the accuracy assessment results, indicated that our cloud removal efforts associated with a multi-temporal spectral analysis approach provided a fairly accurate classification map for an area considered difficult to classify due to persistent cloud cover and challenges in spectrally discriminating among land cover types that have similar spectral characteristics during various times of the year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the multitemporal and multispectral characteristics of remote sensing images, a new method, which is different from the previous contextual based methods, 15,16 is developed. For example, a scene of Landsat-5 TM image covers an area of about 185 × 185 km, with about 40 million pixels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 These methods are generally rarely consider the relationship information of various spectra. [11][12][13][14][15][16] These methods select the best measurement (the most cloud-free pixel) among a set of measurements acquired over a limited time period to represent the considered multitemporal pixels. 2 They can only process an image without significant heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shen et al [11] addressed this issue in a broad technical review. Li et al [12], Melgani [13], Benabdelkader et al [14], Benabdelkader et al [15] and Gómez-Chova et al [16] addressed cloud removal with approaches that build cloudfree image composites selecting cloud-free pixels in images collected along a short period. Despite these approaches proving visually high-quality images, they did not meet the high temporal frequency needed for many agricultural applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%