2008
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31818599b8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcome of the Simplified Surgical Technique for BAHA Implantation

Abstract: The modified Nijmegen surgical technique is a simple straightforward surgical procedure without the use of a pedicled skin flap. Surgery takes approximately 20 minutes. Meticulous performance of the procedure is considered important to achieve optimal results in the long-term. Particularly the soft tissue reduction has to be done with great care. In terms of the low rates of implant failure and adverse tissue reactions, the Nijmegen surgical technique proved to be a good alternative to other techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
107
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(34 reference statements)
6
107
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Holgers Grade 0 in 63.4% and Holgers Grade 2 or more in 29.3% of patients. When taking a look at the complication rates with the linear incision technique, a Holgers Grade 2 or more is seen in 26.7% of patients (vs. 29.3% in the present study) [15]. Recently, van de Berg et al [16] reported their clinical outcome using four different techniques in consecutive cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Holgers Grade 0 in 63.4% and Holgers Grade 2 or more in 29.3% of patients. When taking a look at the complication rates with the linear incision technique, a Holgers Grade 2 or more is seen in 26.7% of patients (vs. 29.3% in the present study) [15]. Recently, van de Berg et al [16] reported their clinical outcome using four different techniques in consecutive cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Two techniques are most commonly used nowadays: the skin flap dermatome technique [10,11] and the linear incision technique [13,15]. The common goal of each technique is to allow optimal osseointegration and create a thinned skin flap at the retroauricular region to minimize skin mobility around the abutment and thus minimizing infectious skin reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear incision technique was developed in the early 1990s with the aim of simplifying the surgical technique by removing the need for a skin flap and therefore avoiding the risk of flap necrosis [28]. Other reported advantages include minimal disturbance of the skin at the implant site and a reduction of surgery time to approximately 20 min in experienced hands.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An area of periosteum and subcutaneous tissue was removed in a circle approximately 4 cm in diameter surrounding the implant site. The skin was then closed around the abutment and covered with petroleum gauze and a protective cap [2,8,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%