2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of Baha® implantation using a small horizontal incision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classic C type surgical method leaves a large scar, which may invade the inside of the hairline. However, the skin incision along the hairline showed little scarring even 6 month after surgery and did not disturb hair growth [16]. The uniform positions of the implants also enable wearing a hat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classic C type surgical method leaves a large scar, which may invade the inside of the hairline. However, the skin incision along the hairline showed little scarring even 6 month after surgery and did not disturb hair growth [16]. The uniform positions of the implants also enable wearing a hat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The surgical location of the Baha Attract is the flat surface of the optimal surgical site of the temporal bone. The conditions for the magnet position of the Baha Attract are (1) a flat surface large enough for the magnet, (2) a depth of 4 mm or greater, and (3) easy exposure of the implantation site during surgery [1,11,15,16]. The safe zone, which satisfies all three conditions, can be roughly classified into two types: the conventional surgical site, where the implant is often located, and the optimal surgical site in the retrosigmoid area (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With time, less invasive techniques for their placement have evolved with no difference in complication rates when compared to traditional flap techniques. 1,2 Newer implants with longer abutments have made simple punch incisions possible. This method decreases operative time and costs with no significant difference from traditional techniques with regard to postoperative pain and soft tissue reaction rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%