A prospective analysis of patients referred by Otolaryngologists from a tertiary hospital for detailed assessment of the posterior cranial fossa was undertaken. The objectives were to evaluate radiological characteristics of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) within the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and the internal auditory canal (IAC), and to correlate these characteristics with ipsilateral auditory symptoms. Three hundred and thirty-two consecutive adult patients who presented with unilateral auditory symptoms were studied. All patients were referred by the Department of Otolaryngology at City Hospital, Birmingham, from October 1999 to October 2001. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with three-dimensional Fourier Transformation Constructive Interference in Steady State (3D FT-CISS) was the imaging strategy used to investigate each patient. Six hundred and sixty-four sides were studied and the AICA loop was identified in all patients. Using a simple anatomical classification to type the loops: there were 412 type I loops (within the CPA), 202 type II loops (at the porus acousticus, extending up to 50% of IAC) and 50 type III loops (extending beyond 50% of IAC). There was a statistically significant association with unilateral hearing loss and type II and III AICA loops (P = 0.016 and P = 0.006 respectively). An association between the presence of a large diameter vascular loop in the CPA and unilateral auditory symptoms was not found to be significant (P > 0.05).

Evidence before this study: Acute appendicitis is the most common general surgical emergency in children. Its diagnosis remains challenging and children presenting with acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain may be admitted for clinical observation or undergo normal appendicectomy (removal of a histologically normal appendix). A search for external validation studies of risk prediction models for acute appendicitis in children was performed on MEDLINE and Web of Science on 12 January 2017 using the search terms ["appendicitis" OR "appendectomy" OR "appendicectomy"] AND ["score" OR "model" OR "nomogram" OR "scoring"]. Studies validating prediction models aimed at differentiating acute appendicitis from all other causes of RIF pain were included. No date restrictions were applied. Validation studies were most commonly performed for the Alvarado, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score (AIRS), and Paediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) models. Most validation studies were based on retrospective, single centre, or small cohorts, and findings regarding model performance were inconsistent. There was no high quality evidence to guide selection of the optimum model and threshold cutoff for identification of low-risk children in the UK and Ireland. Added value of this study: Most children admitted to hospital with RIF pain do not undergo surgery. When children do undergo appendicectomy, removal of a normal appendix (normal appendicectomy) is common, occurring in around 1 in 6 children. The Shera score is able to identify a large low-risk group of children who present with acute RIF pain but do not have acute appendicitis (specificity 44%). This low-risk group has an overall 1 in 30 risk of acute appendicitis and a 1 in 270 risk of perforated appendicitis. The Shera score is unable to achieve a sufficiently high positive predictive value to select a high-risk group who should proceed directly to surgery. Current diagnostic performance of ultrasound is also too poor to select children for surgery. Implications of all the available evidence: Routine pre-operative risk scoring could inform shared decision making by doctors, children, and parents by supporting safe selection of lowrisk patients for ambulatory management, reducing unnecessary admissions and normal appendicectomy. Hospitals should ensure seven-day-a-week availability of ultrasound for medium and high-risk patients. Ultrasound should be performed by operators trained to assess for acute appendicitis in children. For children in whom diagnostic uncertainty remains following ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or low-dose computed tomography (CT) are second-line investigations.

Objectives: To assess the audiological outcomes, practicalities, and impact on quality of life of a new, nonimplantable, adhesive retained bone conduction hearing aid in children. Study design: A prospective, single-subject repeat measure, cohort study. Setting: Community and in pediatric assessment center. Patients: Twenty-one children aged between 5 and 15 years with a conductive hearing loss of >/=25 dB HL in the better hearing ear. Intervention: Audiological comparisons were made using pure-tone thresholds; unaided, with a softband aid, and with the new adhesive retained bone conducting system. Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of hearing threshold levels. Data analysis via paired t-testing, significance set at p value <0.01. Quality of life was assessed via the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory and a 10 cm linear analogue scale. A hearing aid review questionnaire provided insight into practical use. Results: Statistically significant improvement in thresholds of 7.3 dB HL (p=0.0001) was demonstrated with the adhesive system as compared with softband aids. After 4 weeks of usage, the mean hearing thresholds for the adhesive hearing system improved from 55 dB HL ± 2.4 to 31 dB HL± 7.9 in unaided and aided conditions. Improvements in QOL were demonstrated with LAS and GCBI. Four children reported mild skin reactions. Eighty-six percent reported improved self-confidence. Conclusion: The adhesive aid produces comparable audiological results to the commercial softband hearing aids. It provides an excellent alternative in the treatment of conductive hearing loss without the possible complications and costs of a surgical intervention. Furthermore, it preserves skin envelope over the mastoid for those who wish to proceed with an autologous pinna reconstruction in the future.

No abstract

No abstract