1992
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90232-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three other 10-day treatment clinical trials comparing cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin-clavulanate (4,15,32), including the largest one performed to date (317 patients) (4), have previously reported therapeutically effective regimens of cefuroxime axetil tablets to be associated with significantly fewer drug-related adverse events, particularly diarrhea and other gastrointestinal events, than was amoxicillin-clavulanate. Similarly, when 10-day treatments with the suspension formulation of the two drugs were compared for more than 600 pediatric patients with acute otitis media (22,28), cefuroxime axetil resulted in significantly fewer drug-related adverse events, particularly diarrhea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three other 10-day treatment clinical trials comparing cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin-clavulanate (4,15,32), including the largest one performed to date (317 patients) (4), have previously reported therapeutically effective regimens of cefuroxime axetil tablets to be associated with significantly fewer drug-related adverse events, particularly diarrhea and other gastrointestinal events, than was amoxicillin-clavulanate. Similarly, when 10-day treatments with the suspension formulation of the two drugs were compared for more than 600 pediatric patients with acute otitis media (22,28), cefuroxime axetil resulted in significantly fewer drug-related adverse events, particularly diarrhea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High tissue concentrations of both components may be achieved after either oral or parenteral administration (Munch, Blaser & Siegenthaler, 1981;Weismeier et al, 1989). Good in-vitro anti-staphylococcal activity is reflected in efficacy in vivo, as shown in the experimental model of endocarditis (Cantoni etal., 1989;Franciolli etal., 1991;Fluckigere/a/., 1992;Entenza et al, 1994) as well as clinically (Fleisher, Wilmott & Campos, 1983;Camacho et al, 1992;Powers, 1993;Tassler, 1993;Moreillon, 1994). Good results have been obtained with ampicillin/sulbactam in children with staphylococcal skeletal infections (Aronoffe/ al., 1986;Loffler et al, 1986).…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Co-amoxiclav (Or Similar Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antimicrobial agents effective against potentially resistant pathogens must therefore be used for empiric treatment. The most common pathogens identified in studies 4,[8][9][10]14 of patients with acute bacterial sinusitis were S pneumoniae and H influenzae, with S aureus, gram-negative bacilli, and anaerobes identified with varying frequency. ␤-Lactamase-producing bacteria(suchasHinfluenzae)areresistanttopenicillinsalone and susceptible to the amoxicillin-clavulanate combination.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%