2004
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/67909783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and radiological features of odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: review of the literature and report of four new cases

Abstract: OGCC demonstrates clinical and radiographic features of a malignant tumour with high recurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, 89% (17/19) showed poorly defined borders and 11% (2/19) showed well defined borders. Root resorption was reported in 31% (6/19) of patients, and tooth displacements in 21% (4/19) 93,94,95…”
Section: Ghost Cell Odontogenic Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 89% (17/19) showed poorly defined borders and 11% (2/19) showed well defined borders. Root resorption was reported in 31% (6/19) of patients, and tooth displacements in 21% (4/19) 93,94,95…”
Section: Ghost Cell Odontogenic Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma, a malignant counterpart of the calcifying odontogenic cyst, is an exceptionally rare malignant odontogenic tumour. To our knowledge, since Ikemura et al (1985) reported a well-documented case of calcifying odontogenic cyst with malignant transformation, 25 cases of ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma have been reported in the English-language literature (Grodjesk et al, 1987;Alcalde et al, 1996;Lu et al, 1999;Cheng et al, 2004;Goldenberg et al, 2004;Sun et al, 2007). Although it often presents with symptomatic swelling in the jaws and shows osseous destruction, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), and vitronectin receptor, both osteoclast-related cytokines, have not been described in this carcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 provides a concise review of the literature on clinical and pathological characteristics of GCOC [3, 5, 6, 917]. Here, the recurrent case was considered a benign lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%