2022
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.895265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Shocks and Farmers’ Agricultural Productive Investment: Resisting Risk or Escaping Production?

Abstract: Climate shocks can increase uncertainty in agricultural production. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), this study examines the impact of climate shocks on farmers’ productive investment and its mechanism of village public productive investment. The study found the following: (1) The impact of climate shocks have a significant impact on farmers’ productive investment choices. Farmers who are greatly impacted by climate shocks have a significantly lower probability of increasing their total p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning indirect impact, our outcomes revealed that agricultural labour force, fertilizer consumption and financial development are the transmission channels through which floods and droughts reduce maize, rice and sorghum yields, respectively. Our outcome is consistent with [ 25 ] who think that climate-related disruptions have affected farmers’ investment choices, resulting in decreased expenditures on machinery, seeds, and pesticides and [ 26 ] who estimate that fluctuations in weather conditions influence agricultural assets such as land, livestock, and farming equipment. Indeed, while floods or droughts occur, this made agricultural activities difficult for farmers and to survive, they are forced to leave their villages for the cities to engage in non-agricultural activities, this leads to yields reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning indirect impact, our outcomes revealed that agricultural labour force, fertilizer consumption and financial development are the transmission channels through which floods and droughts reduce maize, rice and sorghum yields, respectively. Our outcome is consistent with [ 25 ] who think that climate-related disruptions have affected farmers’ investment choices, resulting in decreased expenditures on machinery, seeds, and pesticides and [ 26 ] who estimate that fluctuations in weather conditions influence agricultural assets such as land, livestock, and farming equipment. Indeed, while floods or droughts occur, this made agricultural activities difficult for farmers and to survive, they are forced to leave their villages for the cities to engage in non-agricultural activities, this leads to yields reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, climate extreme events can lead (i) to soil leaching, this in turn can reduce soil fertility and productivity, (ii) farm labour migration in another areas to do off farm activities, this reduces farm labour and in turn lessens food productivity and finally, (iii) increase farmer household credit constraints because financial institutions will provide less loan to farmers which experienced floods or droughts events; this can be an obstacle for farmers' to access capital to produce food. Similarly, climate-related disruptions (i) have affected farmers’ investment choices, resulting in decreased expenditures on machinery, seeds, and pesticides [ 25 ] and, (ii) influence agricultural assets such as land, livestock, and farming equipment [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Column (3) of Table 6 shows that the coefficient of CS is negative and significant at the 0.01 level, indicating that climate shocks reduce the productive investment of farm households [38]. The coefficient of productive investment in column ( 4) is positive and significant at the 0.01 level, indicating that an increase in farmers' productive investment increases their poverty vulnerability.…”
Section: Mediating Effect Of Household Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 97%