2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-015-1817-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clenbuterol Assay by Spectral Imaging Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor System

Abstract: To prevent illegal use of clenbuterol and for quality control in the food industry, more efficient and reliable methods for clenbuterol detection are needed. In this study, clenbuterol was detected using a spectral imaging surface plasmon resonance sensor system via two inhibition methods: (1) the target site compensation method, in which anti-clenbuterol antibody was immobilized on the sensor chip as a bioprobe and (2) the solution competition method in which a clenbuterol-BSA conjugate was immobilized on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, LOD was only 2 ppt (2 pg mL −1 ) for the unlabeled Ab, which was approximately 40 times higher than that of the Ab-AuNP conjugate. To the best of our knowledge, such extremely high sensitivity has not been reported for the detection of clenbuterol [ELISA: 100-25 pg mL −1 [27,33]; amperometry: 1.3 pg mL −1 [34]; fluorescence spectroscopy: 0.12 µg L −1 [35]; SPR: 2.0 µg L −1 [36]; Spectral Imaging SPR: 6.7-4.5 µg mL −1 [37]. Sensitivity enhancement can be explained by kinetic analysis of the indirect competitive inhibition immunoassay.…”
Section: Immunoassay Using the Ab-aunp Conjugatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, LOD was only 2 ppt (2 pg mL −1 ) for the unlabeled Ab, which was approximately 40 times higher than that of the Ab-AuNP conjugate. To the best of our knowledge, such extremely high sensitivity has not been reported for the detection of clenbuterol [ELISA: 100-25 pg mL −1 [27,33]; amperometry: 1.3 pg mL −1 [34]; fluorescence spectroscopy: 0.12 µg L −1 [35]; SPR: 2.0 µg L −1 [36]; Spectral Imaging SPR: 6.7-4.5 µg mL −1 [37]. Sensitivity enhancement can be explained by kinetic analysis of the indirect competitive inhibition immunoassay.…”
Section: Immunoassay Using the Ab-aunp Conjugatementioning
confidence: 99%