2017
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000003984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleft Lip and Palate: Demographic Patterns and the Associated Communication Disorders

Abstract: Data suggested that families who had children with OFCs displayed poor socioeconomic status and low educational level which may impede the delivery of health education by health practitioners. Increased risk of comorbid communication disorders and malformations in OFC patients must be emphasized and disseminated to health professionals involved in the management of patients with OFC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
17
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypoacusis in our study population was the third most frequent clinical feature associated with CL/P, with 1.88% of patients. However, this prevalence is strikingly lower compared to previous reports of 19% to 25% (Alfwaress et al, 2017), and this finding could be a consequence of a less-than-optimal diagnostic rate of this disease, which would encourage the implementation of better assessment protocols to examine patients with CL/P.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Hypoacusis in our study population was the third most frequent clinical feature associated with CL/P, with 1.88% of patients. However, this prevalence is strikingly lower compared to previous reports of 19% to 25% (Alfwaress et al, 2017), and this finding could be a consequence of a less-than-optimal diagnostic rate of this disease, which would encourage the implementation of better assessment protocols to examine patients with CL/P.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The available literature of studies in smaller population cohorts suggests a possible relationship between various measures of socioeconomic status, including education, income, and insurance status, and the incidence of orofacial clefts. [18][19][20][21][22][23] Notably, the association between socioeconomic Fig. 2.…”
Section: Proxy Indicators Of Socioeconomic Status and Cleft Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some sociodemographic factors, such as social exclusion, low economic and educational level, and geographical marginalization have been related to increased incidence of CLP in Mexico [30]. Alfwaress et al reported a similar situation in Jordan: CLP children were born in families with low income and low educational levels [31].…”
Section: Environmental Risk Factors and Some Sociodemographic Charmentioning
confidence: 99%