2021
DOI: 10.1177/10556656211000551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Descriptive Study of Orofacial Clefts in Colombia: 2069 Patients From Operation Smile Foundation

Abstract: Objective: To describe the population of patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) in terms of cleft phenotypes, gender, age, ethnic group, family history, clinical presentation (syndromic vs nonsyndromic), some environmental and behavioral factors, and some clinical features. Design: Descriptive retrospective study. Setting: Patients attending the genetics counseling practice in Operation Smile Foundation, Bogotá, Colombia, for over 8 years. Participants: No screening was conducted. All patients requiring … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison, in a previous study conducted in Colombia, the estimated rate of unilateral cleft lip was 11.4% (236 out of 2069), while the rate of bilateral cleft lip was 2.08% (43 out of 2069). [14] In a study carried out in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the estimated rate of unilateral cleft lip was 20% (26 out of 130), while the rate of bilateral cleft lip was 5% (7 out of 130). [7] In our study, for cleft palate, incomplete unilateral cleft palate was the most common with a rate of 39 out of 132 (29.5%), followed by complete bilateral 34 out of 132 (25.80%), then complete unilateral 31 out of 132 (23.50%), and finally Incomplete Bilateral 7 out of 132 (5.30%) (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, in a previous study conducted in Colombia, the estimated rate of unilateral cleft lip was 11.4% (236 out of 2069), while the rate of bilateral cleft lip was 2.08% (43 out of 2069). [14] In a study carried out in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the estimated rate of unilateral cleft lip was 20% (26 out of 130), while the rate of bilateral cleft lip was 5% (7 out of 130). [7] In our study, for cleft palate, incomplete unilateral cleft palate was the most common with a rate of 39 out of 132 (29.5%), followed by complete bilateral 34 out of 132 (25.80%), then complete unilateral 31 out of 132 (23.50%), and finally Incomplete Bilateral 7 out of 132 (5.30%) (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these findings differ from the previous ones reported in 2014 in which Van der Woude was declared to be the most common syndrome associated with CL/P, accounting for ~2% of all CL/P cases [ 35 ], and are in dark contrast with another study in which other syndromes such as the Edwards syndrome (28%) and the brain-lung-thyroid syndrome (17%) were the most common ones [ 1 ]. These disparities could be related to the methodology used to diagnose the syndromes, as well as variances in the base populations and ethnicities [ 36 ]. Overall, there are no accurate data available because the clinical diagnosis of these CL/P-associated syndromes has a large and variable phenotypic spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there are no accurate data available because the clinical diagnosis of these CL/P-associated syndromes has a large and variable phenotypic spectrum. Clinicians must be trained, and molecular studies are needed to confirm the diagnosis and determine the specific prevalence of each disease in each patient in the Iranian population [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many CL/P international organizations embark on outreach trips primarily for direct cleft repairs or to establish infrastructure for cleft care training (Chahine et al, 2020; Volk et al, 2020; Kantar et al, 2021; Espinosa et al, 2021). The goal of these organizations is to establish a longitudinal capacity building that sustainably benefits the local host sites and patient populations (Yao et al, 2016; Sommer et al, 2020; Espinosa et al, 2021). Utilizing GT data coupled with WHO health indicators can help elucidate the specific needs of LMICs and regions within those countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%