rofacial clefts-cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate only-are among the most common congenital anomalies in the United States and the world. 1,2 Children born with orofacial clefts may experience significant long-term health sequelae, including dental and speech pathologies and stigmatizing appearance differences, even after reconstructive surgery. 3,4 Ample research has explored the multifactorial etiology of orofacial clefts, including disparities in incidence across populations. [5][6][7] Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple populationspecific genetic loci that may predispose individuals to nonsyndromic orofacial clefts. [8][9][10][11][12] The risks of cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate only also vary across different racial/ethnic groups, with lowest frequencies in African-derived populations and highest in Asians, in general. 6 Maternal factors (such as exposure to tobacco smoke, alcohol, and anticonvulsants) and nutritional deficiencies

Purpose: How different from “normal” are the cranial base and vault of infants with nonsyndromic, single-suture sagittal synostosis (NSSS)? This study quantitatively addresses this question utilizing computed tomography (CT) analytic technology. Method: Head CT scans of infants with NSSS and normocephalic controls were analyzed using Mimics to calculate craniometric angles, distances, and segmented volumes. Craniometric measurements and asymmetry indices were compared between NSSS and control groups using linear regressions controlling for age. Ratios of anterior-, middle-, and posterior-to-total cranial vault volume were compared between groups using beta regressions controlling for age. Results: Seventeen patients with NSSS and 19 controls were identified. Cranial index and interoccipital angle were significantly smaller in NSSS compared with controls (P = 0.003 and <0.001, respectively). Right—but not left—external acoustic meatus angle and internal acoustic meatus-to-midline distance were significantly greater in NSSS than in controls (P = 0.021 and 0.016, respectively). NSSS patients and controls did not significantly differ in any asymmetry indices, except for the articular fossa angle asymmetry index (P = 0.016). Anterior vault volume proportion was greater in NSSS relative to controls (proportion ratio = 1.63, P < 0.001). NSSS trended toward a smaller posterior vault volume proportion (P = 0.068) yet did not differ in middle vault volume proportion compared with controls. Conclusion: In this small study, patients with nonsyndromic, single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis had relatively similar cranial base measurements, and larger anterior vault volumes, when compared with controls. Further work is needed to confirm the possibility of rightward asymmetry of the anterior cranial base.

Craniofacial surgery continues to be a rapidly evolving field, due in part to interdisciplinary collaboration that has allowed for sharing of knowledge and methodologies, which has expanded greatly due to online journals and publications. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (JCS) is a highly regarded journal that has attracted attention for its mission to increase diversity and global representation in manuscript submissions and research publications. The purpose of this study is to provide an objective measurement of global participation in craniofacial research specifically as it pertains to the JCS. Through a bibliometric analysis, the country of origin of all articles published in the JCS from 2010 to 2019 was analyzed. In line with its mission, the JCS increased its overall production 1.9 times during the past decade and increased its global representation 1.6 times, as represented by the number of countries contributing (78). The journal produced 8147 articles with Turkey (1424), USA (1397), China (1178), South Korea (1023), and Italy (644) being the top producers. The highest represented states were Florida (156), New York (130), California (117), Massachusetts (112), and Pennsylvania (106). The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery has the greatest diversity of country representation of the major plastic and reconstructive journals compared. Overall the JCS has stayed true to its mission to foster craniofacial research and is a valuable resource for craniofacial surgeons across the world. This study provides an analysis of trends in global contributions to craniofacial research and highlights areas for further increasing global contributors to the field of craniofacial surgery.

Objective: Historically, open surgical bypass provided a durable repair among diabetic patients with chronic limbthreatening ischemia (CLTI). In the current endovascular era, however, the difference in long-term outcomes between first-time revascularization strategies among patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is poorly understood.Methods: We reviewed the records of all patients with IDDM undergoing a first-time infrainguinal bypass graft (BPG) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting (PTA/S) for CLTI at our institution from 2005 to 2014. We defined IDDM as use of chronic insulin administration at baseline to control blood glucose levels and recorded the most recent glycated hemoglobin value available within 3 months before the procedure and fasting blood glucose level on the day of the procedure. We compared rates of wound healing, restenosis, reintervention, major amputation, and mortality between BPG and PTA/S in our population using c 2 , Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses. As a sensitivity analysis, we calculated propensity scores and employed inverse probability weighting to account for nonrandom assignment to BPG vs PTA/S.

Background: Patients undergoing orthognathic skeletal correction present with a variety of comorbidities that may affect surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine how patient risk factors and operative technique contribute to complication rates after orthognathic surgery in the era of patient-specific implants. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of pediatric patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and/or genioplasty from 2014 to 2018. Patient risk factors, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were gathered and compared with appropriate statistics. Results: Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria, with an overall 1-year complication rate of 11.7 percent (11 of 94). Patient-specific mandibular plates are significantly associated with infection (p = 0.009; OR, 8.8), occurrence of any complication (p = 0.003; OR, 8.3), readmission (p < 0.001; OR, 11.1), and reoperation (p < 0.001; OR, 11.4). In patients with syndromes or history of cleft lip/palate, patient-specific mandibular plates are associated with infection (p = 0.006; OR, 10.3), readmission (p < 0.001; OR, 21.6), and reoperation (p < 0.001; OR, 22.9). In multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, syndrome status, and orofacial cleft history, use of patient-specific mandibular plates was associated with infection (p = 0.017; adjusted OR, 12.5), any complication (p = 0.007; adjusted OR, 11.8), readmission (p = 0.001; adjusted OR, 17.9), and reoperation (p = 0.001; adjusted OR, 18.9). Conclusions: In the era of patient-specific orthognathic surgery, syndromic status and use of patient-specific mandibular plates are associated with increased infection, readmission, and reoperation because of hardware-related complications. The authors’ data support increased caution and counseling with use of patient-specific mandibular implants in patients with syndromic status, history of orofacial cleft, and history of previous maxillomandibular surgery given increased risk of hardware-related complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Introduction: While the use of virtual surgical planning (VSP) has been well described in the adult craniofacial literature, there has been little written about pediatric uses or trends. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evolving utilization of VSP for pediatric craniofacial procedures. Methods: The authors’ prospective institutional review board-approved craniofacial registry was queried for index craniofacial procedures from January 2011 through December 2018. Data was collected regarding utilization of traditional surgical planning versus VSP, as well as the extent of VSP's influence on the operative procedure. These data were analyzed for trends over time and compared using appropriate statistics. Results: During the study period, a total of 1131 index craniofacial cases were performed, of which 160 cases (14.1%) utilized VSP. Utilization of VSP collectively increased over time, from 2.0% in 2011 to 18.6% in 2018 (P < 0.001). Utilization rates of VSP varied across procedures from 0% of craniosynostosis cases and fronto-orbital advancement cases to 67% of osteocutaneous free tissue transfers (P < 0.001). The most profound contributor to increase in VSP utilization was orthognathic surgery, utilized in 0% of orthognathic procedures in 2011 to 68.3% of orthognathic procedures in 2018 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Utilization of virtual surgical planning for pediatric craniofacial procedures is increasing, especially for complex orthognathic procedures and osteocutaneous free tissue transfers. Utilization patterns of individual components of the VSP system demonstrate unique footprints across the spectrum of craniofacial procedures, which reinforces the specific and variable benefits of this workflow for treating pediatric craniofacial disorders.

No abstract

No abstract