2008
DOI: 10.1075/tsl.80.08lau
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clause combining, interaction, evidentiality, participation structure, and the conjunction-particle continuum: The Finnishettä

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With an updated perspective that benefits both from the renewed perspective on code-switching and recent studies of voicings in Finnish and Estonian interaction (Routarinne 2005;Laury & Seppänen 2008;Keevallik 2008) we propose to revisit code-switching in voicings. In this paper, we argue that codeswitching between closely related languages, and even in a mixed language base, can still be interactionally meaningful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With an updated perspective that benefits both from the renewed perspective on code-switching and recent studies of voicings in Finnish and Estonian interaction (Routarinne 2005;Laury & Seppänen 2008;Keevallik 2008) we propose to revisit code-switching in voicings. In this paper, we argue that codeswitching between closely related languages, and even in a mixed language base, can still be interactionally meaningful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5. Että-clauses have been described as complements in Finnish, making että a complementizer, but että also functions as a turn-initial and turn-final particle (see Seppänen and Laury 2007;Laury and Seppänen 2008;Koivisto et al 2011;Koivisto 2011; see also Keevallik [2008] on the cognate Estonian et). Ku(n) and jos clauses might ordinarily be analyzed as adverbial clauses rather than complement clauses, but they have also been noted to function as complements (see Hakulinen et al 2004Hakulinen et al : 1098Hakulinen et al -1099on ku(n), see Herlin 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, the niin-clause and the jos-clause are not prosodically linked. Another problem with analyzing the niin-initial turn as the main clause of the jos-clause is that we are not dealing here with just a simple clause, but a string of clauses-the first clause in lines 5 and 6 is linked with ja 'and' to a complex construction made up of a complement-taking predicate (CTP; Thompson, 2002) sen jälkee mie ilmottasin 'after that I would announce' in line 7, followed by two subsequent et(tä)-initial "complement" clauses, which are simply juxtaposed (or asyndetically linked; see Gohl, 2000; on successive että-clauses with no linkers, see Laury, 2006, andSeppänen, 2008)-LAURY namely, et nyt mie jäin (.) <työttömäksi> 'that now I became unemployed' in lines 7 and 8 and että tuota (0.4) tarvitsen tyättömyyskorvausta 'that I need unemployment compensation' in lines 8 and 10, followed by a juxtaposed main clause (lines 10-11), sillonha miulle ei tulis mitää 'then I wouldn't get anything'.…”
Section: Laurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the status of että as a complementizer, seeLaury (2006),Laury and Seppänen (2008), andSeppänen and Laury (2007). Downloaded by [Florida State University] at 04:19 20 December 2014…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%