1983
DOI: 10.24033/asens.1462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification analytique des équations différentielles non linéaires résonnantes du premier ordre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
139
0
23

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
139
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…, defined for x in the spiraling domain X ± ( ), ∈ E ± , of Definition 12 (for some 0 < η < π 2 arbitrarily small and some δ x , δ > 0 depending on η), and for u ∈ U, which brings Z H to its formal normal form (18). It is uniformly continuous on U × XE ± (25) and analytic on its interior.…”
Section: Remark 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, defined for x in the spiraling domain X ± ( ), ∈ E ± , of Definition 12 (for some 0 < η < π 2 arbitrarily small and some δ x , δ > 0 depending on η), and for u ∈ U, which brings Z H to its formal normal form (18). It is uniformly continuous on U × XE ± (25) and analytic on its interior.…”
Section: Remark 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in our notation ± (u, x, 0) consists of a pair of sectoral transformations (u, x, 0) and (u, x, 0); it is a functional cochain using the terminology of [11,18].…”
Section: Remark 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it was considered by G. Casale in [1] for a germ of diffeomorphism of (C, 0). He computed the list of possible D-groupoids on a disk, and establishing conditions, in each case, on the considered germ of diffeomorphism to be a solution of the D-groupoid, he recovered a part of the Martinet-Ramis analytic classification of germs of diffeomorphisms, as presented in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Martinet and Ramis (in [3]) showed that even a C 1 equivalence between (1.1) and (1.3) will imply either a holomorphic or antiholomorphic equivalence (although the statement and proof which they give is incomplete, it can be corrected easily). In the case that f (z) = z + z 2 , Ahern and Rosay [1] have proven that any germ of an entire function which is C 6 conjugate to f must in fact be holomorphically equivalent to f .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%